Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

MICHAEL A. MORRONE v. COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA (03/07/83)

decided: March 7, 1983.

MICHAEL A. MORRONE, PETITIONER
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, RESPONDENT



Appeal from the Order of the State Civil Service Commission in the case of Michael A. Morrone v. Board of Probation and Parole, Appeal No. 3027.

COUNSEL

Francis Kelley, with him Dante Mattioni, Mattioni, Mattioni & Mattioni, Ltd., for petitioner.

Carl Vaccaro, Deputy Attorney General, with him John O. J. Shellenberger, Deputy Attorney General, and LeRoy S. Zimmerman, Attorney General, for respondent.

Judge Crumlish, Jr. and Judges Rogers and MacPhail, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by President Judge Crumlish, Jr.

Author: Crumlish

[ 72 Pa. Commw. Page 434]

The State Civil Service Commission (Commission) affirmed the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole's (Board) three-day suspension of Michael Morrone. He appealed; we affirm.

A Board investigation confirmed that the records of Morrone, a parole officer, contained false contact

[ 72 Pa. Commw. Page 435]

    entries. On January 10, 1980, Morrone was notified in writing of a three-day suspension for falsifying agency records. After two hearings on his appeal, the Commission found contradictions in Morrone's clients' visitation records and concluded that Morrone "did not, in fact, make all of the client contacts indicated in the progress and conduct reports." While admitting to the inconsistent entries, he claimed that they were inadvertent.

We must affirm an adjudication of the State Civil Service Commission unless constitutional rights have been violated, an error of law has been committed, or the findings of the Commission are not supported by substantial evidence. Silvia v. Pennhurst Center, 63 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 75, 437 A.2d 535 (1981).

Morrone in his first of two due process arguments asserts that the written suspension failed to give "clear and actual notice" of the charges. We disagree. The notification stated, in pertinent part, that:

Under Section 803 of the Civil Service Act,*fn1 you [Morrone] are being suspended for three (3) business days effective close of business January 10, 1980, for the falsification of agency records. Specifically, in June, 1979, it came to this agency's attention that a client had not seen a parole agent at his residence since his assignment to you on December 7, 1978. . . . Upon further ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.