filed: February 18, 1983.
BRIAN I. KING, INDIVIDUALLY AND/OR AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF DAVID J.I. KING, DECEASED, AND ON BEHALF OF ALL MEMBERS OF A CLASS OF INDIVIDUALS SIMILARLY SITUATED, APPELLANT
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Appeal No. 2844 Philadelphia, 1981, from the Judgment of the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Civil Trial Division of No. 3340, December Term, 1980; King, Judge.
Morris M. Shuster, Philadelphia, for appellant.
John Carl Janos, Philadelphia, for appellee.
Hester, Cirillo and Johnson, JJ.
[ 310 Pa. Super. Page 142]
Appellant, Brian I. King, as Administrator of the Estate of his deceased son, David King, brought a suit in assumpsit against the appellee, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. This action evolved from an automobile accident in which appellant's son was fatally injured when an automobile in which he was a passenger struck a utility pole. Since the appellant's deceased son was listed as an insured under a policy issued by the appellee to the appellant, appellant's complaint includes an allegation that appellant has been denied work loss benefits pursuant to the provision of the insurance policy and the Pennsylvania No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act. In response to appellant's suit, appellee filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings which was granted by the lower court on October 23, 1981. It is from this Order that the appellant files this appeal.
The issue presented is whether the estate of a deceased victim is entitled to recover work loss benefits under our No-fault Act. Our court, recently sitting en banc, decided this issue in Freeze v. Donegal Mutual Insurance Company, 301 Pa. Super. 344, 447 A.2d 999 (1982) (Hester, J., Dissenting). The majority of our court held that the estate of a deceased victim is entitled to recover work loss benefits under the No-fault Act.
The order is therefore reversed and the case remanded for disposition not inconsistent with this opinion.
© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.