Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

CROWN WRECKING COMPANY v. ZONING HEARING BOARD ROSS TOWNSHIP (01/21/83)

decided: January 21, 1983.

CROWN WRECKING COMPANY, INC.
v.
ZONING HEARING BOARD OF ROSS TOWNSHIP, ET AL. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF ROSS TOWNSHIP, APPELLANT



Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County in case of Crown Wrecking Company, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Ross Township and Joseph and Margaret Scheuring, and Wilton and Dorothy Bauman, and Warren and Janet Leighliter, and the Township of Ross, No. SA 443 of 1977.

COUNSEL

William W. Milnes, Brandt, Milnes, Rea & Wagner, for appellant.

John R. Dingess, with him Donald E. Seymour, Kirkpatrick, Lockhart, Johnson & Hutchison, for appellee.

President Judge Crumlish, Jr. and Judges Williams, Jr., Craig, MacPhail and Doyle. Opinion by Judge MacPhail.

Author: Macphail

[ 71 Pa. Commw. Page 311]

This case comes to us on appeal from a decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County reversing the Zoning Hearing Board (Board) of Ross Township and ordering Ross Township municipal officials to issue to Crown Wrecking Company (Crown) appropriate use permits to allow Crown to continue to operate its commercial demolition landfill.

The tract of land at issue in this case is located within a residential district in Ross Township. In 1976 neighboring landowners, taking issue with Crown's use of the property as a landfill, brought an action in equity to enjoin Crown's usage. The trial court, after a hearing on the matter, ordered the Ross Township zoning officer "to register or not to register the property"*fn1 as a prior non-conforming use. The zoning officer registered Crown's use as non-conforming and an appeal to the Board was taken by neighboring landowners. The Board reversed the zoning officer and Crown appealed to the Court of Common Pleas. That Court*fn2 ordered the case remanded to the Board for the consideration of factual and legal issues not previously considered.

On remand, the Board held further hearings concerning the usage of this property. Crown asserted

[ 71 Pa. Commw. Page 312]

    four separate legal grounds in support of its claim to use the property as a landfill:

1) that Crown had a right to a variance;

2) that the Ross Township ordinance unconstitutionally ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.