Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

CARLOS QUINONES v. COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA (10/15/82)

COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA


decided: October 15, 1982.

CARLOS QUINONES, PETITIONER
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, RESPONDENT. JULIO MATOS, PETITIONER V. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, RESPONDENT. LUCIANO ROSADO, PETITIONER V. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, RESPONDENT

Appeals from the Orders of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review in cases of In Re: Claim of Carlos Quinones, No. B-200356; In Re: Claim of Julio Matos, No. B-200357; and In Re: Claim of Luciano Rosado, No. B-200358.

COUNSEL

David A. Scholl, for petitioners.

Charles G. Hasson, Assistant Counsel, with him, Richard L. Cole, Jr., Chief Counsel, for respondent.

President Judge Crumlish, Jr. and Judges Blatt and MacPhail, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by President Judge Crumlish, Jr.

Author: Crumlish

[ 69 Pa. Commw. Page 382]

Carlos Quinones*fn1 appeals an Unemployment Compensation Board of Review order affirming a referee's denial of benefits. We vacate and remand.

Quinones was a laborer at Nu-Econo-Brick. Because his work area was poorly heated, he was permitted to leave. Upon returning two days later, his job was gone.

The Employment Security Office found a voluntary quit and denied benefits under Section 402(b) of the Act.*fn2 On appeal, the referee affirmed the denial but for a different reason of willful misconduct due to excessive absenteeism under Section 402(e).*fn3 The Board affirmed the referee.*fn4

[ 69 Pa. Commw. Page 383]

Quinones contends that he was awaiting recall. Neither the Board nor the referee considered this explanation for his absence.

In a willful misconduct case, the employer has the burden of proving misconduct. Wing v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Pa. , , 436 A.2d 179, 181 (1981).

The question of whether a claimant voluntarily quit or was fired is one of law subject to our review, Wing, as is his burden of rebutting the quit finding. O'Donnell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 66 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 105, , 443 A.2d 864, 865 (1982). There is insufficient evidence for us to make that legal determination. We will not infer from the absence of findings on a relevant issue that the issue was resolved against a claimant.

Vacated and remanded.

Order

The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review Orders, Nos. B-200356, B-200357 and B-200358, all dated October 20, 1981, are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Board for the making of new and adequate fact finding.

Disposition

Orders vacated. Cases remanded.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.