The opinion of the court was delivered by: GILES
Plaintiff, Anthony M. Verdi, instituted this suit against defendants City of Philadelphia, ("City") and Liberty Demolition Corporation, ("Liberty"), seeking compensatory and punitive damages for violation of his civil rights under the Civil Rights Acts. 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1976 & Supp. IV 1980). Verdi alleges that without notice, compensation or due process of law, defendants demolished his parents' house containing his personal property.
The plaintiff alleges that in February, 1980, the City determined that his parents' house at 416 Federal Street, Philadelphia was dangerous and ordered it demolished. No notice of this decision was allegedly delivered to the plaintiff nor to his parents, and no notice was posted on the property. On April 4, 1980, defendant Liberty, at the request of the Department of Licenses and Inspections of the City of Philadelphia, demolished the house. The house allegedly contained valuable personal property belonging to the plaintiff.
Defendants contend that the complaint is deficient because it does not allege that they acted pursuant to a custom or policy of the City. I agree. In order to state a valid claim against a municipality under section 1983, the plaintiff must allege that a deprivation of his constitutional rights occurred in the execution of a government's policy or custom. Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, 694, 56 L. Ed. 2d 611, 98 S. Ct. 2018 (1978). In Monell, the Supreme Court analyzed the legislative history of the Civil Rights Acts of 1871 and found that "Congress did intend municipalities . . . to be included among those persons to whom § 1983 applies." Monell, 436 U.S. at 690 (emphasis in original) (footnote omitted). The Court emphasized, however, that:
a local government may not be sued under § 1983 for an injury inflicted solely by its employees or agents. Instead, it is when execution of a government's policy or custom, whether made by its lawmakers or by those whose edicts or acts may fairly be said to represent official policy, inflicts the injury that the government as an entity is responsible under § 1983.
Id. at 694 (emphasis added). See also Hassell v. City of Philadelphia, 507 F. Supp. 814, 816 (E.D. Pa. 1981).
Thus, even accepting as true all allegations of the complaint and reasonable inferences that can be drawn from it, Miree v. DeKalb County, 433 U.S. 25, 27 n.2, 53 L. Ed. 2d 557, 97 S. Ct. 2490 n.2 (1977), I find that plaintiff's complaint fails to state a claim as to either defendant.
However, "to accomplish the dual objectives of weeding out frivolous cases and keeping federal courts open to legitimate civil rights claims," Rotolo v. Borough of Charleroi, 532 F.2d 920, 923 (3d Cir. 1976), I shall dismiss the complaint without prejudice and with leave to amend.
AND NOW, this 3rd day of September, 1982, it is hereby ORDERED that for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the motions to dismiss filed by the City of Philadelphia and Liberty Demolition Corporation are GRANTED. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without ...