Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

WILLIAM T. ZANDER v. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (WARRINGTON EQUIPMENT COMPANY) (08/24/82)

decided: August 24, 1982.

WILLIAM T. ZANDER, PETITIONER
v.
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (WARRINGTON EQUIPMENT COMPANY), RESPONDENTS



Appeal from the Order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board in case of William T. Zander v. Warrington Equipment Company, No. A-78921.

COUNSEL

Bernard D. Cullen, Brady, Lindner & Cullen, for petitioner.

Kevin J. Ruane, with him Thomas Dempster, III, and John F. Dougherty, Jr., for respondent.

Judges Rogers, Blatt and Craig, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Craig.

Author: Craig

[ 68 Pa. Commw. Page 413]

Claimant William T. Zander appeals the order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed a referee's order denying claimant benefits under the Workmen's Compensation Act.*fn1

In May, 1974, the claimant injured his back (first injury) in the course of his employment with Warrington Equipment Company. The claimant received compensation for the resulting disability (first disability) until he returned to work in November, 1974.

The claimant testified that he continued to experience pain from his first disability, that he began doing work which involved lifting sometime in 1976 and that

[ 68 Pa. Commw. Page 414]

    in January, 1977, while in the course of his employment, he slipped on ice and fell. Although the claimant did not miss any work until June, 1977, he testified that he began to experience more pain than usual, and that he consulted his physician and began receiving therapy. On June 10, 1977, while driving home from a therapy session, the claimant experienced a "terrific burning pain" in his back. In connection with an operation on July 18, 1977, the operating physician determined that the claimant had a herniated disk. The claimant has not worked since.

The claimant argues that his current disability resulted from an aggravation of the first disability and, in his claim petition, states that his current disability may have been caused by lifting at work or by his January, 1977, fall.*fn2

Obviously, a claimant must prove that the disability was caused by a work-related injury. Because claimant did not assert a recurrence of his first disability,*fn3 he must prove that his current disability was caused by a second work-related injury, whether or not the first disability is involved causally as a pre-existing condition.

The referee found that claimant did not slip and fall at work. The claimant's testimony was the only evidence of the alleged slip and fall, and the referee found that ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.