Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

ANDREW HORVAT v. DOLORES HORVAT (08/20/82)

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA


filed: August 20, 1982.

ANDREW HORVAT, APPELLANT,
v.
DOLORES HORVAT

No. 2501 Philadelphia, 1981, Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County at No. A06-80-60251-A-10-3

COUNSEL

Edward S. Wardell, Philadelphia, for appellant.

Allen W. Toadvine, Langhorne, for appellee.

Wickersham, McEwen and Lipez, JJ.

Author: Per Curiam

[ 303 Pa. Super. Page 407]

This is an appeal from the dismissal of a petition under the Protection From Abuse Act. Judge Shertz observed for a panel of this court in a recent case under that Act:

Section 10189 of the Act in question provides that any proceeding thereunder shall be in accordance with the Rules of Civil Procedure. In addition, Rule 1905, Pa.R.Civ.P., which was promulgated to implement the Act, provides: "The decision of the court and the time for exceptions thereto shall be governed by Rule 1038(b) to (e) inclusive." Rule 1038(d), Pa.R.Civ.P., in turn, requires the filing of exceptions to the decision of the lower court.

Knisely v. Knisely, 295 Pa. Super.Ct. 240, 241, 441 A.2d 438, 439 (1982) (footnote omitted). Appellant here failed to file exceptions. Therefore he preserved no issues, and the appeal must be dismissed. See Pa.R.A.P. 1972(5).

Appeal dismissed.

19820820

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.