Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

VERNON E. LIVINGSTON v. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (UPPER YODER TOWNSHIP) (07/19/82)

decided: July 19, 1982.

VERNON E. LIVINGSTON, PETITIONER
v.
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (UPPER YODER TOWNSHIP), RESPONDENTS



Appeal from the Order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board in case of Vernon E. Livingston v. Upper Yoder Township.

COUNSEL

James R. DiFrancesco, for petitioner.

Edward G. Kuyat, Jr., for respondents.

Judges Blatt, Williams, Jr. and MacPhail, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge MacPhail.

Author: Macphail

[ 67 Pa. Commw. Page 497]

In this appeal by the Claimant*fn1 from a decision of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Board)

[ 67 Pa. Commw. Page 498]

    awarding partial disability benefits only, the issue is whether the Employer*fn2 met its burden of proving the availability of suitable work within the Claimant's physical capabilities. The referee found as a fact that the Employer had met its burden and his decision was affirmed by the Board.

None of the underlying facts in this case are in dispute. On May 16, 1977, Claimant suffered a compensable injury as a result of which a Notice of Compensation Payable was executed by Employer's insurance carrier awarding total disability payments to Claimant. Those payments continued until the effective date of an automatic supersedeas entered pursuant to a physician's affidavit of full recovery executed January 28, 1980.

At the hearing on Employer's petition to terminate, the Employer offered medical testimony by way of deposition which fully supports the referee's finding of partial disability. Unless the Employer proves also that there is available work within the Claimant's physical limitations, however, the medical evidence of partial as opposed to total disability in and of itself is insufficient to reduce the award. State Products Corporation v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 61 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 366, 434 A.2d 207 (1981). In the instant case, the only evidence of available work was a mailgram from Vocational Rehabilitation Services, Inc. which Claimant admitted receiving in July, 1979, which stated that a school bus driving job was available at that time. The Claimant refused that job because he felt he was physically incapable of handling it. The physician who examined the Claimant for the Employer in January, 1980, testified by way of deposition on April 1, 1980, that in his opinion, such a job would be within Claimant's physical

[ 67 Pa. Commw. Page 499]

    capabilities. All of the physician's relevant testimony was as to facts in praesenti and not at some prior point in time.*fn3 Neither at the referee's hearing of February 27, 1980, nor at the continued hearing held August 13, 1980, did the Employer offer any evidence that the school bus job was available at that time ; nevertheless, the referee found that

8. Work is available to the claimant that he could perform within the limitations of his disability operating a school bus for the McIllwain Bus Lines, 1559 Ferndale Avenue, Johnstown, PA. which job would pay wages at the rate of $85 per week ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.