Appeal from the Order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review in case of In Re: Claim of Robert K. Shyer, No. B-192199.
Michael Schutzbank, with him Jonathan Glenn Granoff, Barsky, Golden & Remick, for petitioner.
John Kupchinsky, Associate Counsel, with him William J. Kennedy, Associate Counsel, and Richard L. Cole, Jr., Chief Counsel, for respondent.
President Judge Crumlish and Judges Blatt and Doyle, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Blatt. Judge Mencer did not participate in the decision in this case.
[ 66 Pa. Commw. Page 628]
The petitioner, Robert K. Shyer, seeks reversal of an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which denied him benefits, finding that he was discharged for willful misconduct*fn1 because he was involved in an accident in which his employer's vehicle was seriously damaged as a result of his driving at an excessive rate of speed. The Board concedes, however, that the finding was not supported by substantial evidence and requests that we remand the matter for the taking of additional evidence from which new findings may be reached.
Inasmuch as our review of the record reveals that the petitioner's own testimony was not consistent as
[ 66 Pa. Commw. Page 629]
to the cause of the accident*fn2 and in light of the Board's duty to protect the unemployment compensation fund, and its request for remand, Bala v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 42 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 487, 400 A.2d 1359 (1979), we will order that this case be remanded for further proceedings.
And Now, this 27th day of May, 1982, the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review in the above-captioned matter is reversed and the record is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the foregoing opinion.
Judge Mencer did not participate in the decision ...