Appeals from the Order of the Department of Public Welfare, in the case of Appeal of: Ms. Shirley Keller, Case No. 102862-P, and in the case of Appeal of: Helen P. Snyder, dated February 24, 1981.
Thomas W. Scott, Killian & Gephart, for petitioners.
Kathleen McGrath, with her Amy Zapp, Deputy Attorney General, Bruce G. Baron, Assistant General Counsel, and LeRoy S. Zimmerman, Attorney General, for respondent.
Judges Mencer, Blatt and Doyle, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Mencer.
[ 65 Pa. Commw. Page 521]
Shirley Keller and Helen P. Snyder (petitioners) have each appealed from decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Welfare (Department) which denied reimbursement for diagnostic x-rays ordered by chiropractors. The two cases were consolidated for argument. We reverse in both.
Each of the petitioners is eligible for medical assistance pursuant to Section 441.1 of the Public Welfare Code (Code), Act of June 13, 1967, P.L. 31, as amended, added by Section 5 of the Act of July 31,
[ 65 Pa. Commw. Page 5221968]
, P.L. 904, 62 P.S. § 441.1. Each of them sought treatment from a chiropractor who ordered diagnostic x-rays. Each was denied reimbursement for the cost because diagnostic x-rays are not included in the schedule of chiropratic services covered by the Medical Assistance Program, 55 Pa. Code § 1145.11, although they are included in the schedule of medical services covered by the program, 55 Pa. Code § 1141, Appendix A, Part V. Both petitioners argue that this exclusion is improper because the legislature intended that diagnostic x-rays be reimbursable when ordered by a chiropractor. We agree.
Section 443.3 of the Code, added by Section 5 of the Act of July 31, 1968, P.L. 904, 63 P.S. § 443.3, provides, in pertinent part:
Payments on behalf of eligible persons shall be made for other services, as follows:
(2) Rates established by the department for (i) other laboratory and X-ray services prescribed by a physician, chiropractor or podiatrist and furnished by a facility other than a hospital which is qualified to participate under Title XIX of the Federal Social Security Act. . . .
This section clearly expresses a legislative intent to provide payment for diagnostic x-rays ordered by a chiropractor. The Department may not frustrate this legislative intent by adopting an inconsistent regulation. See Lumadue v. Department of Public Welfare, 37 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 428, 391 A.2d 22 (1978). Moreover, while the qualifying language "[r]ates established by the department" gives the Department power to determine the ...