Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

ALBERT C. WEISS v. CITY PHILADELPHIA (03/10/82)

decided: March 10, 1982.

ALBERT C. WEISS, APPELLANT
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. FRANK AUGOSTINI, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. STELLA R. DZINSKI, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. HERBERT J. CROSSETT, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. JOHN P. MARTIN, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. JAMES F. BROWN, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. PASQUALE V. MALITO, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. MARY L. HOLLOWAY, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. EDWARD K. TRUELAND, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. THOMAS J. HARRISON, JR., APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. GREGORY FERDINAND, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. FRANK BARESICH, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. CHARLES E. ANDERSON, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. JAMES J. COSTELLO, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. WALTER E. BAILEY, JR., APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. TIMOTHY L. BRAMHALL, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. MICHAEL A. PAGANO, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. WILLIAM M. BRADLEY, JR., APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. GEORGE C. HODGE, SR., APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. ROXEY MATTEO, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. FRANCIS DELOWEREY, SR., APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. ROBERT B. LABAR, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. AMEDEO N. MASTROGIOVANNI, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. HAROLD D. KIRKENDOLL, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. PETER O'NEILL, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. CHARLES T. WALTON, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. JOHN A. MAGAZU, JR., APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. THOMAS J. SKAY, JR., APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. ROCCO E. MAGNOTTA, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. WILLIAM C. PETERS, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. SALVATORE LIOTTA, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. CHARLES H. BITLER, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. HORACE J. SHIPLEE, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. RICHARD R. ABRUZZESE, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. MAX WISELTIER, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. PAUL A. RAGONE, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. THOMAS J. COYLE, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. ROBERT P. ROYLE, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. WILLIAM E. MALADY, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. FRED S. WYLEN, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. JOSEPH J. VANDY, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. LOUIS R. TAYLOR, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. FRANCIS BOYLE, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. DUNCAN DUBE, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. WILLIAM F. DICK, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. ROBERT E. JENKINS, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. FRANCIS D. KLEIN, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. FELIX L. OKRASINSKI, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. ROBERT M. LUTNER, JR., APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. P.J. DEANGELIS, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. JESSE S. JAMES, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. ROBERT T. DICKSON, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. CHARLES M. JONES, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. CHARLES REILLY, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. ROBERT K. OSTERMUELLER, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. EDWARD BRACELAND, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE. JOHN D. BRNA, APPELLANT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLEE



Appeals from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County in fifty-eight cases consolidated by stipulation under Docket No. 514 August Term, 1979.

COUNSEL

Timothy R. Smith, Tomar, Kamensky & Smith, for appellant, Albert C. Weiss.

Ellis Eisen, Assistant City Solicitor, with him, Alan J. Davis, City Solicitor, and Stewart M. Weintraub, Deputy City Solicitor, for appellee.

Judges Rogers, Blatt and Craig, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Blatt. Judge Palladino did not participate in the decision in this case.

Author: Blatt

[ 65 Pa. Commw. Page 265]

The appellant, Albert C. Weiss, appeals*fn1 an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County dismissing his answer and new matter.

The appellee, the City of Philadelphia (city), instituted in the court below a complaint in assumpsit against the appellant for the collection of delinquent wage taxes allegedly owed by him. The appellant filed an answer and new matter*fn2 in response to such complaint and the city then interposed preliminary objections to his new matter. The court below, by its own admission,*fn3 inadvertently dismissed the appellant's answer in addition to striking his new matter. Such obvious and admitted error is, we believe, a basis for a remand here with directions to reinstate the stricken answer. The issue that remains before us, however, is whether or not, in view of our decision to reinstate the

[ 65 Pa. Commw. Page 266]

    answer, the striking of the appellant's new matter is interlocutory and therefore not properly appealable. The city, of course, contends that the order of the court below to strike the new matter is interlocutory and unappealable while the appellant contends that such order effectively removes him from court.

It is well-established that an appeal will lie only from a final order unless otherwise expressly allowed by statute.*fn4 Municipality of Bethel Park Appeal, 51 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 128, 414 A.2d 401 (1980). And, as a matter of policy, the rule against entertaining appeals from interlocutory orders was developed to preclude piecemeal determinations and the consequent protraction of litigation. Sullivan v. Philadelphia, 378 Pa. 648, 107 A.2d 854 (1954). Moreover, we have recognized that an adjudication must dispose of the entire case, end the litigation, or effectively put the litigant out of court in order for it to be considered to be a final and appealable order. Bethel Park.

Although the above standard is rhetorically clear, its application is often difficult. See Brink's Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, (Nos. 1833 and 1966 C.D. 1981, filed November 12, 1981). Our Supreme Court has held that review of a lower court's rejection of a litigant's new matter which asserts pure questions of law (rather than fact) is interlocutory and unappealable.*fn5 Marshall v. Powers, 477 Pa. 306, 383 A.2d 946 (1978); Adcox v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Assoc. Casualty Insurance Co., 419 Pa. 170, 213 A.2d 366 (1965). Here, our examination of the appellant's new matter discloses that, except for the section alleging that the appellant did not work in the city for

[ 65 Pa. Commw. Page 267]

    the entire period alleged in the complaint, such pleadings assert questions of law*fn6 rather than "factual matter[s] to be proved to the trier of fact." Adcox, 419 Pa. at 174, 213 A.2d at 368. See also ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.