Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

ROGER E. BUCHANAN AND DOROTHY BUCHANAN v. CENTURY FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION (02/19/82)

filed: February 19, 1982.

ROGER E. BUCHANAN AND DOROTHY BUCHANAN, ET AL.
v.
CENTURY FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, ET AL. APPEAL OF EQUIBANK



No. 837 Pittsburgh, 1980, Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas, Civil Division, of Allegheny County, No. 2781 January Term, 1972, In Equity.

COUNSEL

Joan Feldman, Pittsburgh, for appellants.

Michael P. Malakoff, Pittsburgh, for appellees.

Wickersham, Wieand and Beck, JJ. Wieand, J., files a dissenting opinion.

Author: Beck

[ 295 Pa. Super. Page 386]

This appeal arises from the interpretation of a settlement agreement which settled an action by classes of mortgagors against several mortgagee banks in both the federal and state courts. The agreement was executed by all parties on January 22, 1976. By its terms, the settlement agreement was subject to, and contingent upon, court approval in both the state and federal actions. The hearing judge found as a fact that it was normal to, and the parties did in fact, contemplate that court approval would take a lengthy period of time. Final court approval was forthcoming on April 19, 1979.

The portion of the agreement giving rise to controversy necessitating a court ruling from which this appeal is taken reads as follows:

ยง 3.03. Beginning on the date of final approval of this Agreement, but retroactive to January 1, 1976, the Defendants either

(a) Shall pay at least two (2) percent interest per annum to their Residential Mortgagors on sums paid to a particular Defendant equivalent to one-twelfth the annual hazard insurance premiums, annual real estate taxes and/or assessments or other charges;

(b) Shall credit such advance payments against the principal balances on such mortgage loans; or

(c) Shall grant, by writing separate from the mortgage and bond or note, such mortgagors the option either of paying their annual hazard insurance premiums, annual real estate taxes and/or assessments or other charges themselves, or of making such payments equivalent to one-twelfth of such amounts each month to Defendants, in which case, no interest need be paid by Defendants on such payments.

If interest is to be paid by a Defendant under Subsection (a) herein, it shall be calculated in a manner no less favorable to ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.