No. 237 Pittsburgh, 1981, No. 145 Pittsburgh, 1981, Appeals from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas, Civil Division, of Allegheny County, No. 2781, January Term, 1972, In Equity.
Michael P. Malakoff, Pittsburgh, for appellants (at No. 145) and for appellees (at No. 237).
Joan Feldman, Pittsburgh, for appellant (at No. 237) and for appellee (at No. 145).
Wickersham, Wieand and Beck, JJ. Wieand, J., files a concurring and dissenting opinion.
[ 295 Pa. Super. Page 392]
This appeal arises from the interpretation of a settlement agreement which settled an action by classes of mortgagors*fn1
[ 295 Pa. Super. Page 393]
against several mortgagee banks in both the federal and state courts. The agreement was executed by all parties on January 22, 1976. By its terms, the settlement agreement was subject to, and contingent upon, court approval in both the state and federal actions. The hearing judge found as a fact that it was normal to, and the parties did in fact, contemplate that court approval would take a lengthy period of time. Final court approval was forthcoming on April 19, 1979.*fn2
The portion of the agreement giving rise to the controversy necessitating a court ruling from which this appeal is taken reads as follows:
§ 3.03. Beginning on the date of final approval of this Agreement, but retroactive to January 1, 1976, the Defendants either:
(a) Shall pay at least two (2) percent interest per annum to their Residential Mortgagors on sums paid to a particular Defendant equivalent to one-twelfth the annual hazard insurance premiums, annual real estate taxes and/or assessments or other charges;
(b) Shall credit such advance payments against the principal balances on such mortgage loans; or
(c) Shall grant, by writing separate from the mortgage and bond or note, such mortgagors the option either of paying their annual hazard insurance premiums, annual real estate taxes and/or assessments or other charges themselves, or of making ...