Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County in the case of Milton Clark v. Board of License and Inspection Review and Betty J. Parrish et al., No. 4092 January Term, 1974.
Andrew F. Erba, for appellants.
Leonard J. Bucki, of counsel: Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohen, for appellee, Milton Clark.
Judges Williams, Jr., MacPhail and Palladino, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge MacPhail.
[ 63 Pa. Commw. Page 554]
Betty J. Parrish, Lillian Allen and Edith Howard (tenants) appeal from a Philadelphia Common Pleas Court order releasing escrowed rental payments to Milton Clark (landlord). We affirm.
On December 27, 1972, the Philadelphia Department of Licenses and Inspections declared premises situate at 136 South 54th Street, Philadelphia, unfit for habitation.*fn1 Tenants began to deposit rental payments to an escrow account in accordance with the Act of January 24, 1966, P.L. (1965) 1534, as amended, 35 P.S. 1700-1, which provides for release of escrowed rent to the landlord if the property is declared fit within six months.*fn2 On June 26, 1973, the Department lifted the unfit designation.
On appeal by the tenants, the Board of License and Inspection Review, on December 28, 1973, reversed the June 26th lifting of the unfit designation. After remanding to the Board for fact finding in accordance with Section 6 of Local Agency Law, Act of December 2, 1968, P.L. 1133, as amended, 53 P.S. § 11306, the lower court sustained the Board's finding that all violations were cleared by January 12, 1974 and ordered all escrowed funds released to the landlord.
Where the court below took no additional evidence, our scope of review is limited to determining whether constitutional rights were violated, errors of law have
[ 63 Pa. Commw. Page 555]
been committed or findings of fact necessary to support the adjudication are not supported by substantial evidence. Wilson v. Board of License and Inspection Review, 16 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 586, 329 A.2d 908 (1974).
Tenants allege that their due process rights were violated, that the Board's fact findings are not supported by substantial evidence, and that the lower court misapplied our decision in Palmer v. Allegheny County Health Department, 21 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 246, 345 A.2d 317 (1975).
We find no merit in tenants' arguments and affirm the lower court based on the able opinion of Judge Marutani, Clark v. Board of License and Inspection Review, Phila. C.P. No. ...