Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

SHELDON DORIAN v. COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA (11/18/81)

decided: November 18, 1981.

SHELDON DORIAN, PETITIONER
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, RESPONDENT



Appeal from the Order of the Department of Public Welfare in case of Appeal of Sheldon Dorian, dated March 31, 1980.

COUNSEL

Lawrence D. Funsten, for petitioner.

Jason Marnne, with him Carol A. Genduso, Assistant Counsel, for respondent.

Judges Rogers, Blatt and Craig, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Rogers.

Author: Rogers

[ 62 Pa. Commw. Page 458]

In December, 1979, Sheldon Dorian applied to the Department of Public Welfare for a one-time grant to cover the costs of clothing and supplies necessary to his continued studies at the University of Pittsburgh undergraduate electrical engineering program in which he was enrolled. Mr. Dorian is a partially blind recipient of General Assistance and was advised to enroll in the engineering program by his Bureau of Vocational Rehabilitation adviser. 55 Pa. Code § 175.23(c)(2) provides:

(2) Nonrecurring one-time grant. A nonrecurring one-time grant may be authorized for an allowance to meet the actual minimum cost, subject to the specified maximum allowances, for any of the following items provided an individual shows that these items are needed in order to apply for or to accept employment or training which will result in decreasing or preventing his need for assistance.

Following a hearing, the application was approved by a hearing examiner but this decision was reversed by the Office of Hearings and Appeals on the ground that:

A four-year undergraduate degree program is not considered a training program regardless of whether it is a liberal arts program or related to a specific discipline.

Mr. Dorian seeks review of this decision arguing that it represents a purely arbitrary exercise of the Department's discretion.

Counsel for both parties rely on our decision in Coston v. Department of Public Welfare, 50 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 319, 413 A.2d 4 (1980). This reliance

[ 62 Pa. Commw. Page 459]

    is misplaced. In Coston the issue was whether a college program at Temple University was part of a "training program . . . that is part of the training plan of the Department . . ." within the meaning of 55 Pa. Code § 175(c)(3). We there held that, on the facts of that case, certain prior representations and decisions of the Department constituted approval of Ms. Coston's undergraduate program at Temple University. Here the Department's approval of Mr. Dorian's program is not at issue. For receipt of this nonrecurring grant the only ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.