Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

ROBERT A. WILLIAMS v. COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA (09/17/81)

decided: September 17, 1981.

ROBERT A. WILLIAMS, PETITIONER
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, RESPONDENT



Appeal from the Order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review in the case of In Re: Robert A. Williams, No. B-181541.

COUNSEL

Sylvia Denys, for petitioner.

Karen Durkin, Assistant Attorney General, with her Stephen B. Lipson, Assistant Attorney General, Richard Wagner, Chief Counsel, and Harvey Bartle, III, Attorney General, for respondent.

President Judge Crumlish and Judges Rogers and Blatt, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by President Judge Crumlish.

Author: Crumlish

[ 61 Pa. Commw. Page 614]

Robert A. Williams appeals from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review denying benefits under Section 402(b)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Act)*fn1 and ordering the recoupment of $110 of unentitled compensation.*fn2 His appeal fails.

Williams, a bricklayer, was laid off on November 23, 1979. On December 6, 1979, Williams was informed that a new job would start the following day. He went to the work site on December 7th, as instructed, but failed to report to his employer in an effort to secure employment. We agree with the denial of benefits, but conclude that Williams is ineligible because he refused an offer of suitable work.*fn3

Where an employee, laid off for lack of work, is recalled by his employer to a job which he is capable of performing, the employee's refusal to accept the position is a failure to accept suitable work, thus making him ineligible to receive benefits. Grossman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 52 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 499, 415 A.2d 1018 (1980). Since Williams was laid off on November 23, 1979, he could not have voluntarily quit as he was already unemployed. The issue then is whether Williams' actions constituted a refusal of suitable work from the employer.

[ 61 Pa. Commw. Page 615]

By leaving the job site with knowledge that work was available, Williams' actions constituted a refusal of an offer of suitable work rendering him ineligible for benefits.

Affirmed.

Order

The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review order at B-181541, dated January 8, 1980, denying unemployment benefits to Robert A. Williams for compensable weeks ending December 8, 1979 through December 29, ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.