Appeal from the Order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review in case of In Re: Claim of Patrick W. Quinn, No. B-180652.
Robert E. Sheeder, Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, for petitioner.
William J. Kennedy, Associate Counsel, with him Richard Wagner, Counsel, and Richard L. Cole, Jr., Chief Counsel, for respondent.
President Judge Crumlish and Judges Blatt and MacPhail, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by President Judge Crumlish.
[ 60 Pa. Commw. Page 596]
The Pressley Ridge School appeals an Unemployment Compensation Board of Review decision granting benefits and holding that Patrick W. Quinn had
[ 60 Pa. Commw. Page 597]
necessitous and compelling reason for voluntarily leaving his employment.*fn1 We reverse.
Quinn was employed as a night teacher-counselor at the Pressley Ridge School, a residential day school for emotionally-disturbed children. At the time of hire, Quinn was informed that work would be difficult and require being on duty some 77 1/2 hours per week. He was not specifically informed of additional duties such as staff meetings, appointments with various sound service people, or staying with sick children during the day, sometimes requiring an average of 19 additional hours per week without additional compensation. Dissatisfied with his employment due to the additional hours he was required to work, Quinn spoke to his employer several times about another job which he thought would be better for him. However, he was informed that no alternative employment was available for him at that time.
On June 20, 1979, Quinn submitted his letter of resignation to become effective July 19, 1979.*fn2 This letter did not state any reason for the resignation, but a subsequent letter indicated that he had resigned because of the number of hours. The Office of Employment Security and the referee denied benefits. After a remand to augment the record, the Board reversed the denial holding that the additional hours constituted a variation in his contract for hire and thus Quinn had a necessitous and compelling reason for leaving his employment. We disagree.
[ 60 Pa. Commw. Page 598]
This Court has held on numerous occasions that an employee who accepts a position admits the initial suitability of the work with respect to wages and conditions of employment and that, in order to be eligible for unemployment benefits after a subsequent resignation, the employee must show that the job conditions had changed or that he or she was misled by the employer as to the conditions which were later found to be objectionable. Hazzard v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 50 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 620, 413 A.2d 478 (1980).
Although Quinn testified that he believed he would work only 77 1/2 hours per week, we are not convinced that the record supports a conclusion that Quinn was misled by the employer at the time of hire. The record indicates that Quinn was initially aware that the schedule would be difficult, and that he worked the schedule for 8 1/2 months. Additionally, the record reveals that the Program Director at the Pressley Ridge School sent a preemployment letter to him stating that the "[w]ork schedule is one of a continuous schedule, presently, four days on and two days off, complete 24 hour duty." (Emphasis added.) On this type of work schedule (e.g., four days on, two days off), an employee could be required to work an average of 120 hours per ...