Appeal from the Order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review in case of In Re: Claim of David Bagell, No. B-180518.
Miles Warner, with him, S. Simpson Gray, for petitioner.
Steven R. Marcuse, Assistant Attorney General, with him, Richard Wagner, Chief Counsel, and Harvey Bartle, III, Attorney General, for respondent.
President Judge Crumlish and Judges Blatt and Craig sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by President Judge Crumlish. Judge Wilkinson, Jr., did not participate in the decision in this case. Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by Judge Blatt.
[ 59 Pa. Commw. Page 648]
David Bagell appeals a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review affirming the dismissal of his claim for failure to file a timely appeal. We affirm.
On April 6, 1979, the Office of Employment Security ruled that Bagell was ineligible to receive benefits under Section 402(h) of the Unemployment Compensation
[ 59 Pa. Commw. Page 649]
Law.*fn1 In addition to this ruling, the Office also determined that Bagell must recoup a fault overpayment of $1,924. Notices of the rulings were mailed to Bagell on April 6, 1979. The notices designated April 23, 1979, as the last date on which Bagell could file an appeal.
On May 2, 1979, the Office issued a corrected determination ruling that Bagell's fault overpayment was $1,776. A copy of this determination was mailed to Bagell which erroneously designated April 23, 1979, as the final date for filing an appeal. Bagell appealed the fault overpayment on October 29, 1979.
Bagell asserts that he shouldn't be time barred because it was the Office's negligence which caused his late filing. He argues that he would have timely filed if it hadn't been for the confusion which resulted when the Office sent a determination notice which designated a final appeal date prior in time to the notice's actual postmark. We find no merit in this argument.
We note with considerable interest that Bagell failed to take any steps to appeal the Office's initial determination dated April 6, 1979.*fn2 With the exception of a computation error in Bagell's favor, the April 6th ruling placed Bagell on notice that he had received an adverse decision which could be appealed at any time prior to April 23, 1979. Bagell's assertion that ...