Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

WAYNE RUSSELL HORNER v. COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA (06/08/81)

decided: June 8, 1981.

WAYNE RUSSELL HORNER, APPELLANT
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, APPELLEE



Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County in case of Wayne Russell Horner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, No. 6852 of 1979.

COUNSEL

James J. Conlin, for appellant.

Harold H. Cramer, with him Ward T. Williams, Chief Counsel, Transportation, for appellee.

Judges Mencer, Williams, Jr. and Craig, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Williams, Jr.

Author: Williams

[ 59 Pa. Commw. Page 520]

Wayne Russell Horner (appellant) appeals from an Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County which affirmed the suspension of appellant's operator's license by the Bureau of Traffic Safety (Bureau) of the Department of Transportation. Horner was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol or controlled substance; the Bureau suspended his license for six months in accordance with Section 1532(b)(1) of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa. C.S. 1532(b)(1), which mandates such suspension upon proof of conviction of the above offense.

The appellant admits his conviction of driving under the influence of alcohol or controlled substance, an offense under Section 3731 of the Code, 75 Pa. C.S. § 3731; a certified record of that conviction was

[ 59 Pa. Commw. Page 521]

    obtained by the Bureau and is a part of this record. Section 1532(b)(1) of the Code provides in pertinent part as follows:

(b) Suspension

(1) The department shall suspend the operating privilege of any driver for six months upon receiving a certified record of the driver's conviction of any offense under the following provisions:

Section 3731 (relating to driving under influence of alcohol or controlled substance).

The appellant contends that his suspension is null and void because the Bureau failed to impose the suspension within six months. This contention is utterly devoid of merit. Appellant attempts to avoid the statutorily mandated suspension by relying on the provisions of Section 1551 of the Code, 75 Pa. C.S. § 1551. Section 1551 deals with notice of suspension due to accumulated points, and by its clear language requires that notice of such a suspension be given within six months of the conviction which results in sufficient points to cause the suspension. Section 1532(b) ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.