Nos. 356-357 Pittsburgh, 1980, Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Mercer County, Criminal Division, Nos. 44 and 47 December Session 1974.
Charles F. Gilchrest, Sharon, for appellant.
James P. Epstein, Assistant District Attorney, Mercer, for Commonwealth, appellee.
Spaeth, Wickersham and Lipez, JJ.
[ 287 Pa. Super. Page 355]
Appellant was charged, under one indictment, with burglary,*fn1 theft by unlawful taking,*fn2 theft by receiving stolen property,*fn3 and conspiracy.*fn4 He was charged on a second indictment with burglary and conspiracy. Pursuant to a plea bargain, he entered a plea of guilty to the burglary charge in the first indictment, and the court granted the Commonwealth's motion for nolle prosequi with regard to the other charges.
By petition under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act, appellant successfully challenged the guilty plea on the ground that the colloquy pursuant to which it was entered was defective. The court below permitted him to withdraw his plea. On the Commonwealth's motion, the lower court also removed the nolle prosequi previously granted and ordered appellant to stand trial on all of the original charges. Appellant challenges this order on federal and state double jeopardy grounds.
Having reviewed the record, we conclude that appellant's contention that the colloquy's defects were the result of overreaching or gross negligence on the part of the hearing court is without merit. The issue in this appeal is, therefore, substantially identical to those resolved against the respective defendants in Commonwealth v. Ward, 493 Pa. 115, 425 A.2d 401 (1981); Commonwealth v. Tabb, 491 Pa. 372, 421 A.2d 183 (1980); and Commonwealth v. Klobuchir, 486 Pa. 241,
[ 287 Pa. Super. Page 356405]
A.2d 881 (1979), by which cases our decision here is controlled.