Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

ST. CATHERINE CHURCH v. MOUNTAINTOP AREA JOINT SANITARY AUTHORITY (04/01/81)

decided: April 1, 1981.

ST. CATHERINE CHURCH, ST. JUDE CHURCH, APPELLANTS
v.
THE MOUNTAINTOP AREA JOINT SANITARY AUTHORITY, APPELLEE



Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County in case of Saint Catherine Church and St. Jude Church v. The Mountaintop Area Sanitary Authority, No. 879-C-1980.

COUNSEL

John L. McDonald, for appellants.

Joseph P. Mellody, Jr., for appellee.

Judges Blatt, Craig and Williams, Jr., sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Craig. This decision was reached prior to the expiration of the term of office of Judge Wilkinson, Jr.

Author: Craig

[ 58 Pa. Commw. Page 181]

St. Catherine Church and St. Jude Church appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of

[ 58 Pa. Commw. Page 182]

Luzerne County which dismissed their complaints in ejectment and trespass against the Mountaintop Area Joint Sanitary Authority.

The churches alleged that the authority wrongfully entered their lands and constructed sewer lines across them without filing any declaration of taking or otherwise exercising its power of eminent domain. That the authority filed no declaration and that the lines were so laid is uncontested.

In sustaining preliminary objections by the authority, the lower court reasoned that the churches' exclusive remedy here was to treat the alleged authority action as a de facto taking and petition for the appointment of viewers under § 502(e) of the Eminent Domain Code.*fn1 The churches contend that remedy is inadequate because viewers can only assess damages, and that trespass and ejectment should lie to permit the abatement of the alleged unlawful entry and ouster of the authority.

Ramad Realty Corp. v. Springettsbury Township Sewer Authority, 10 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 1, 309 A.2d 80 (1973), controls this case. We there clearly held that § 406 of the Eminent Domain Code enables the common pleas court "to order removal if the construction is found to be invalid in the first instance," thus ultimately affording a complete and therefore exclusive remedy for an invalid taking.

Ramad likewise clearly stated that, in situations like this case, where a de facto taking has been accomplished, and the landowner "does not wish to proceed under § 502(e) [for damages] and there is no declaration of taking to challenge [by ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.