Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas, Civil Division, of Lycoming County in the case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Tony R. Parr, No. 79-1045.
Harold H. Cramer, Assistant Attorney General, with him, Ward T. Williams, Chief Counsel, and Harvey Bartle, III, Acting Attorney General, for appellant.
Michael H. Collins, McNerney, Page, Vanderlin and Hall, for appellee.
Judges Mencer, Rogers and Blatt, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Rogers.
[ 56 Pa. Commw. Page 204]
Tony R. Parr was charged before a District Justice of attempting to elude a pursuing police vehicle, a summary offense described in Section 3733 of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa. C.S. § 3733. He entered a guilty plea on September 28, 1977 and was sentenced to pay a fine. The District Justice permitted Parr to pay the fine in installments, which he did not complete until March 20, 1979. In neglect or disregard of the requirements of the Vehicle Code at 75 Pa. C.S. § 6322 the District Justice failed to send the certification of conviction to the Department of Transportation (Department) until February, 1979.*fn1 After involuntarily leaving a job which did not require a driver's license, Parr found employment in which a license was required in August 1978.
The Department gave Parr notice of a six month suspension of his driver's license on March 5, 1979, to become effective April 19, 1979, in accordance with the Vehicle Code at 75 Pa. C.S. § 1532(b)(1). Mr. Parr
[ 56 Pa. Commw. Page 205]
appealed the suspension to the Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming County which set it aside. The Department has appealed and we reverse.
The lower court overturned the suspension of Parr's license because a period in excess of eighteen months elapsed between the time of his conviction and the time the Department gave notice of suspension and because Parr in the meantime took work which required a license. The Department correctly argues that the lower court erred because the delay in issuing the notice was caused by the District Justice's failure to notify the Department of the conviction for seventeen months. Even if the Department somehow knew of Parr's conviction, it could not act until it received a certified record of his conviction. 75 Pa. C.S. § 1532(b). We have held that no delay can be chargeable to the Department before it is in receipt of the certification of conviction. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Kirk, 48 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 429, 410 A.2d 95 (1980); Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Thompson, 17 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 505, 333 A.2d 479 (1975). Here, there was virtually no delay on the part of the Department. It received the certification of conviction in February 1979 (the day is not in the record) and gave notice on March 5, 1979.
It is not necessary to consider the Department's other arguments based on the differences between the "old" and "new" Vehicle Codes beyond noting that they too are cogent.
And Now, this 21st day of January, 1981, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming County is reversed and the order of the ...