Appeal from the Order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review in case of In Re: Claim of William Stang, No. B-173050.
Catherine T. Martin, for petitioner.
Steven Marcuse, Assistant Attorney General, with him John T. Kupchinsky, Assistant Attorney General, Richard Wagner, Chief Counsel and Edward G. Biester, Jr., Attorney General, for respondent.
Judges Rogers, Blatt and Williams, Jr., sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Blatt.
[ 52 Pa. Commw. Page 556]
William Stang (claimant) appeals here from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) denying him compensation under Section 402(b)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. § 802(b)(1), which denies benefits to those who voluntarily leave work without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature.
[ 52 Pa. Commw. Page 557]
The claimant was employed by the United States Postal Service (employer) as a clerk and he retired in January of 1979. He subsequently applied for unemployment compensation, and he testified at a hearing before a referee that he retired because of chest pains he suffered when he pushed heavy containers of mail. He also presented a doctor's certificate so indicating, and he personally testified that he was available and able to perform lighter clerical duties.
The Board's crucial findings were as follows:
4. The claimant did not request other work more suitable to his condition before retiring.
5. Continuing work was available to the claimant had he chosen to remain employed.
Generally, an employee who leaves his employment for health reasons must meet three requirements to establish eligibility for unemployment compensation:
First, the employee must inform the employer of the health problems . . . Second, the employee must request a transfer to work which is suitable in light of the health problems . . . Third, the employee must offer 'competent testimony that at the time of termination, ...