Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

JOHN B. CISLO v. JOHNSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY (02/08/80)

decided: February 8, 1980.

JOHN B. CISLO, PETITIONER
v.
JOHNSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY, RESPONDENT



Appeal from the Order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board in case of John B. Cislo v. Johnstown Housing Authority, No. A-74450.

COUNSEL

Robert S. Glass of Glass, Glass and Dugas, for appellant.

David P. Andrews, with him James S. Routch, of Patterson, Evey, Routch, Black and Behrens, for respondent.

Judges Wilkinson, Jr., Rogers and Craig, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Craig. Judge DiSalle did not participate in the decision in this case.

Author: Craig

[ 49 Pa. Commw. Page 294]

Claimant John B. Cislo appeals from an order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed a referee's order terminating his workmen's compensation benefit payments.

Claimant, a maintenance worker for the Johnstown Housing Authority, suffered a fracture of the right

[ 49 Pa. Commw. Page 295]

    leg on June 24, 1976. The employer issued a notice of compensation payable and made payments through its insurance carrier. Employer filed a petition to terminate benefits in March, 1977, and, after hearing, the referee ordered the benefits terminated as of June 17, 1977 when, as the referee found, "the claimant's fracture was healed and his disability as the result of his compensable injury ended."

On appeal, claimant asserts that the referee erred as a matter of law in terminating benefits where complications resulting from the compensable injury persisted beyond the date on which the fracture had healed. Further, claimant asserts that the referee capriciously disregarded competent evidence of continuing disability relating from the compensable injury.

The difficulty in the present case arises from claimant's generally poor physical condition. Dr. Bradley, claimant's medical expert, testified that he had been treating claimant since December of 1972. Claimant's condition included gastrointestinal difficulties, chronic bronchitis, a recurrent duodenal and orgastric ulcer disease, fatty liver or cirrhosis, and an "unexplained bout of jaundice," -- all conditions that preceded the fracture in 1976. Further, secondary to the fracture, claimant developed multiple pulmonary emboli, which resulted in claimant's extensive hospitalization. Although Dr. Bradley testified that the emboli situation had cleared, he did state that claimant continues to suffer from "foot drop" of the nonfractured left leg and, as a result, wears a brace on that leg.

On direct examination, Dr. Bradley stated that: "We felt that his left foot drop was related to his disability being in bed for a long period of time and probably related to some spirit ingestion. Now ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.