Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

D.L. CLARK COMPANY v. COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA (02/06/80)

decided: February 6, 1980.

THE D.L. CLARK COMPANY, PETITIONER
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD AND ELIZABETH LEGAN, WIDOW OF MICHAEL LEGAN, RESPONDENTS



Appeal from the Order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board in case of Elizabeth Legan, widow of Michael Legan v. The D.L. Clark Company, No. A-75549.

COUNSEL

Paul K. Geea, with him Robert C. Jones, Jones, Gregg, Creehan and Gerace, for petitioner.

Paul J. Leventon, of Leventon & Leventon, P.C., for respondents.

Judges Crumlish, Jr., Rogers and MacPhail, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Crumlish, Jr. Judge DiSalle did not participate in the decision in this case.

Author: Crumlish

[ 49 Pa. Commw. Page 238]

The D.L. Clark Company (Employer) appeals an order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board affirming a referee's award of benefits to the widow of Michael Legan based on a conclusion that Legan's death was due to unusual strain and overexertion in the course of his employment. We affirm.

Employer raises two issues which we will address seriatim:

1. Whether the referee erred in accepting a death certificate as proof of cause of death in the absence of other competent evidence.

[ 49 Pa. Commw. Page 2392]

. Whether the referee erred in finding that claimant had established a causal connection between death and work by unequivocal medical evidence.

An examination of the second issue will dispose of employer's first contention. It is well settled that causality must be established by unequivocal medical testimony where it is not obvious. Hudack v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 32 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 508, 379 A.2d 1074 (1977). In this case, the referee found the decedent was in the course of his employment when he died as a result of the unusual strain resulting from his efforts to repair a boiler. Claimant's physician provided adequate support for this finding by testifying as follows:

Q Doctor, do you have a medical opinion as to the assumed statements of facts which I have given to you as to the certainty ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.