Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA v. STEPHEN RALPH SHEETS (02/01/80)

decided: February 1, 1980.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF TRAFFIC SAFETY, APPELLANT
v.
STEPHEN RALPH SHEETS, APPELLEE



Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Stephen Ralph Sheets, No. 78-11548.

COUNSEL

Harold H. Cramer, Assistant Attorney General, with him Robert W. Cunliffe, Deputy Attorney General and Gerald Gornish, Acting Attorney General, for appellant.

Judges Rogers, Blatt and MacPhail, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Rogers. Judge DiSalle did not participate in the decision in this case.

Author: Rogers

[ 49 Pa. Commw. Page 176]

The Commonwealth has appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County which sustained Stephen Ralph Sheets' appeal from an order of the Department of Transportation suspending Sheets' operating privileges for 55 days. This is a point system case.

On June 15, 1977, Sheets was cited for speeding. He pleaded guilty to the offense and three points were assigned to his operators record pursuant to Section 619.1 of the Vehicle Code Act of April 29, 1959, P.L. 58, as amended, 75 P.S. § 619.1. These points properly continued on his record when the new Vehicle Code enacted June 17, 1976, P.L. 162, 75 Pa. C.S. § 101 et seq. became effective on July 1, 1977.

On December 8, 1977, Sheets was cited for passing a red light and was convicted of this offense by a District Justice on December 19, 1977. The District Justice duly reported this conviction to the Department pursuant to Pa. R. Crim. P. 69, whereupon three more points were assigned to his record as of December 8, 1977 as required by 75 Pa. C.S. § 1535(a).

This accumulation of six points caused the Department of Transportation, pursuant to 75 Pa. C.S. § 1538 (a), to require Sheets either to attend a driver improvement

[ 49 Pa. Commw. Page 177]

    school or to undergo a special examination. On March 27, 1978, a date within six months from the conviction resulting in six points (see 75 Pa. C.S. § 1535(c)), the Department notified Sheets that he must take the special examination. Sheets failed to take the examination. Sheets appealed the December 19, 1977 conviction to the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County pursuant to Pa. R. Crim. P. 67. The appeal was dismissed on April 20, 1978.

On February 24, 1978, Sheets was cited for speeding. He paid the fine and costs for this offense on March 7, 1978 and five more points were assigned to his record as of February 24, 1978.

The accumulation of eleven points on Sheets' record caused the Department, on June 8, 1978, to notify Sheets that his operator's privileges were suspended for 55 days as required by 75 Pa. C.S. § 1539(a). It was from this action that he appealed to the court below which, in effectively setting aside the Department's order of suspension, reasoned, as we understand its order, that Sheets' appeal from the conviction by the District Justice of the December 5, 1977 offense somehow purged the conviction from the records at least pending disposition of the appeal. We find nothing in the statutes or Rules of Court which gives the appeal from a conviction by a District Justice of a summary offense under the Vehicle Code such effect. Section 619.1(b) of the former Vehicle Code of 1959, P.L. 58, 75 P.S. § 619.1(b), provided for the assignment of points as of the date of conviction and an argument could conceivably have been made that an appeal from a conviction by a District Justice should be ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.