Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

BEVERLY P. HACKER v. PENNSYLVANIA HORSE RACING COMMISSION (09/28/79)

decided: September 28, 1979.

BEVERLY P. HACKER, PETITIONER
v.
THE PENNSYLVANIA HORSE RACING COMMISSION, RESPONDENT



Appeal from the Order of the Pennsylvania Horse Racing Commission in case of In Re: Beverly Hacker, No. 78-016.

COUNSEL

Bruce E. Cooper, for appellant.

Bartholomew J. DeLuca, with him Larrick B. Stapleton, for appellee.

Judges Wilkinson, Jr., Rogers and Craig, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Wilkinson, Jr.

Author: Wilkinson

[ 46 Pa. Commw. Page 264]

This is an appeal from an order of the Pennsylvania State Horse Racing Commission (Commission) which imposed a fine of $500 upon petitioner, a horse trainer for violation of the Rules of Racing. We affirm.

Petitioner is the registered trainer of the horse Shelter Half, a two-year-old who finished first in the fifth race on December 24, 1977 at Keystone Race Track. Upon the finding of the presence of the drug phenylbutazone, an analgesic, in the urine sample of the horse taken after the race, the Board of Stewards of the race track fined petitioner $100 and disqualified the horse from the purse money. On appeal to the Commission a de novo hearing was held before a hearing examiner. The director of the split sample laboratory for the Commission testified that the horse had received 100 milligrams of phenylbutazone within six to twelve hours of the time the sample was taken. On cross-examination the director stated that

[ 46 Pa. Commw. Page 265]

    this amount represented about one-twentieth of the recommended dosage of 2,000 milligrams and that such a dosage would have a minimal effect, if any, upon the horse. In its adjudication, the Commission accepted the theory advanced by petitioner that the horse had apparently ingested a small quantity of the drug from hay in the stall where Shelter Half was quartered before the race. The Commission sustained the findings of the Board of Stewards that petitioner had violated Rules 15 and 29 of the Rules of Racing; however, the Commission imposed a $500 fine upon petitioner but due to "the special and extraordinary circumstances of this case" ruled the horse eligible for the purse money.

Rule 15.02*fn1 of the Rules of Racing provides:

Should the chemical analysis of any sample taken from a horse entered in a race indicate the presence of any narcotic, stimulant, depressant, local anesthetic or analgesic, the trainer of the horse, together with the assistant trainer, stable foreman, groom, or any other person shown to have had care and attendance of the horse shall be subject to disciplinary action and such horse shall be declared unplaced for every purpose except pari-mutuel wagering which shall in no way be affected.

Rule 15.02(a)2f. also provides: "'Bute' shall not be administered to any two-year-olds to race in Pennsylvania." Rule 29.06 of the Rules provides: "A Trainer shall be responsible for the condition of a horse trained by him."

Petitioner premises his appeal on two arguments. First, he contends that the Commission acted arbitrarily and capriciously in finding a violation of the Rules ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.