Original jurisdiction in case of Mary Patricia Kemery, Administratrix of the Estate of Barry R. Kemery, Deceased v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Fish Commission, Lower Bucks Hospital, William Cappiello, M.D., H. Earl Tucker, M.D., William H. Chamberlain, M.D. and William Fink.
Thomas J. Corrigan, Jr., for plaintiff.
Barbara A. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, with her John L. Sweezy, Chief Attorney of Unit, Theodore A. Adler, Chief Counsel, Department of General Services, and Edward G. Biester, Jr., Attorney General, Alan Dion, Jan E. DuBois, William F. Sullivan, Jr., and Post & Schell, P.A., for defendants.
President Judge Bowman and Judges Crumlish, Jr., Wilkinson, Jr., Mencer, Rogers, Blatt, DiSalle, Craig and MacPhail. Opinion by Judge Wilkinson, Jr. Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by Judge Crumlish, Jr. Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by Judge DiSalle.
This is an action in trespass brought against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Commonwealth), the Pennsylvania Fish Commission (Commission), William Fink (a servant, agent or employee of the Commission), Lower Bucks Hospital and three licensed physicians, Cappiello, Tucker and Chamberlain. The fundamental facts, as alleged in the complaint, are that plaintiff's decedent was shot and wounded by defendant Fink on July 23, 1977, acting within the scope of his authority but in either a willful, negligent, or grossly negligent manner. Plaintiff's decedent was taken to defendant Lower Bucks Hospital for treatment which he received in either a negligent or grossly negligent manner from the three named licensed physicians. He died at the hospital.
Preliminary objections have been filed on behalf of the Commonwealth, the Commission, the Commission's employee Fink, the Lower Bucks Hospital, and the three licensed physicians.
We must sustain the preliminary objections filed by the Commonwealth and by the Commission and dismiss
the complaint as to them for the reasons set forth in our opinion filed in Brungard v. Hartman, 46 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 10, 405 A.2d 1089 (1979).
There has been no assertion, nor could there be, that this cause of action falls within any of the eight exceptions to the sovereign immunity defense provided by 42 Pa. C.S. § 5110.
We must sustain the preliminary objections filed on behalf of the Lower Bucks Hospital and the three licensed physicians because the action against them is within the jurisdiction of an arbitration panel established under the provisions of the Health Care Services Malpractice Act, Act of October 15, 1975, P.L. 390, as amended, 40 P.S. § 1301.101 et seq. This Act provides in Section 309, 40 P.S. § 1301.309 as follows: "The arbitration panel shall have original exclusive jurisdiction to hear and decide any claim brought by a patient or his representative for loss or damages resulting from the furnishing of medical services which were or which should have been provided. . . ." Accordingly, the complaint as to these defendant health care providers will be transferred to the office of Administrator for Arbitration Panel for Health Care.*fn1
There remains the claim against William Fink, an employee of the Commission, referred to in the brief of plaintiff as a deputy fish warden and in the brief of the Attorney General as a Special Waterways Patrolman. Controlled by our decisions in Brungard, supra, and Estate of Armstrong v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 46 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 33, 405 A.2d 1099 (1979) we ...