Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

ALBERT J. BERARDOCCO v. ROBERT E. CASEY (08/13/79)

decided: August 13, 1979.

ALBERT J. BERARDOCCO, PETITIONER
v.
ROBERT E. CASEY, STATE TREASURER OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA AND ALEXANDER F. BARBIERI, COURT ADMINISTRATOR OF PENNSYLVANIA, RESPONDENTS



Original jurisdiction in case of Albert J. Berardocco v. Robert E. Casey, Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and Alexander F. Barbieri, Court Administrator of Pennsylvania.

COUNSEL

Carmen P. Belefonte, with him Kassab, Cherry, Curran & Archbold, for petitioner.

Jonathan Vipond, III, for respondents.

President Judge Bowman and Judges Crumlish, Jr., Wilkinson, Jr., Mencer, Rogers, Blatt and MacPhail. Judges DiSalle and Craig did not participate. Opinion by Judge Crumlish, Jr. President Judge Bowman dissents. Judge Mencer concurs in the result only.

Author: Crumlish

[ 45 Pa. Commw. Page 62]

Albert J. Berardocco, a duly elected District Justice of the Peace,*fn1 contends that he is entitled to salary, pension benefits and other emoluments of his office for the interim period between the date which

[ 45 Pa. Commw. Page 63]

    his statutory term of office commenced and the date he was formally installed, the delay resulting from an election dispute. During the period in question, Berardocco continued his position in private employment, the duties of District Justice being performed by a de facto magistrate who received the salary and other benefits of the office for the interim period in dispute.

Original action was commenced in mandamus against the Honorable Robert E. Casey, State Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the Honorable Alexander F. Barbieri, Court Administrator of Pennsylvania. Motion for summary judgment was subsequently filed.

Motion for summary judgment granted, judgment is directed for the plaintiff.

An elected offical, upon assuming office, is entitled to receive compensation from that date which he was statutorily entitled to commence his elected term even though he did not commence performance of his official duties at that time due to an election dispute. Reed v. Sloan, 475 Pa. 570, 381 A.2d 421 (1977). The right to receive the compensation annexed to public office is legislative or constitutional*fn2 in nature and not contractual. Reed v. Sloan, supra. Salary and other benefits may not be offset by earnings from other sources made by the official during the interim period of dispute and belong to the de jure official even though a de facto official discharged the responsibilities of the office and received compensation. Reed v. Sloan, supra.

Accordingly, ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.