Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

PHILADELPHIA PARENT CHILD CENTER v. COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA (07/26/79)

decided: July 26, 1979.

PHILADELPHIA PARENT CHILD CENTER, INC., PETITIONER
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW AND RENEE B. RICKS, RESPONDENTS



Appeal from the Order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review in case of In Re: Claim of Renee B. Ricks, No. B-162144.

COUNSEL

Larry A. Colston, with him McNeal and Colston, for petitioner.

Reese F. Couch, Assistant Attorney General, with him J. Justin Blewitt, Acting Attorney General, and Robert S. Robbins, for respondents.

Judges Crumlish, Jr., Mencer and Rogers, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Crumlish, Jr.

Author: Crumlish

[ 44 Pa. Commw. Page 453]

The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirmed a referee's award of benefits to Renee B. Ricks. Her employer, the Philadelphia

[ 44 Pa. Commw. Page 454]

Parent Child Center, Inc. (PPCC), appealed. We affirm the Board.

The first of two contentions PPCC urges is that Ricks "voluntarily" terminated her employment without a necessitous or compelling reason.*fn1 Whether a person has voluntarily terminated his employment is a question of law. That a worker intends to leave his job does not of its own mean that the leaving was voluntary for the purposes of Section 402(b)(1) of the Law.*fn2 The totality of circumstances must be considered.

When therefore the pressure of real not imaginary, substantial not trifling, reasonable not whimsical, circumstances compel the decision to leave employment, the decision is voluntary in the sense that the worker has willed it but involuntary because outward pressures have compelled it.

Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation Case, 158 Pa. Superior Ct. 548, 557, 45 A.2d 898, 903 (1946).

The record discloses that Ricks was called to her supervisor's office and told to sign a letter of resignation. Prior to that time, she neither had seen the letter nor had she requested its preparation. What's more, she had no intention of resigning but did so because she thought refusal would precipitate her discharge. This suspicion was later confirmed by her employer. In our judgment, this was not a "voluntary termination".

PPCC's second argument is that the Board erred as a matter of law in disposing of the claim under Section 402(e).*fn3 This ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.