Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA v. GEORGE S. SMITH (05/31/79)

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA


decided: May 31, 1979.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
v.
GEORGE S. SMITH, APPELLANT

No. 111 January Term, 1977, Appeal from Judgment of Sentence of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Trial Division, Criminal Section, Imposed on Bill of Indictment No. 2054, December Term, 1975.

COUNSEL

Walter J. Collins, Jr., Philadelphia, for appellant.

Robert B. Lawler, Chief, Appeals Div., Asst. Dist. Atty., Paul S. Diamond, Asst. Dist. Atty., Philadelphia, for appellee.

Eagen, C. J., and O'Brien, Roberts, Nix, Manderino and Larsen, JJ.

Author: Larsen

[ 485 Pa. Page 245]

OPINION OF THE COURT

After trial without a jury, appellant was found guilty of murder of the third degree; the prosecution arising out of the beating death of Clarence Tilghman in November of 1975. Post-trial motions were denied and, on September 30, 1976, appellant was sentenced to imprisonment for a term of five to fifteen years. In this direct appeal, appellant contends that:

1. The facts adduced at trial did not support his conviction for murder of the third degree because;

     a) the Commonwealth failed to prove that someone else did not beat the deceased after appellant, and

     b) the argument which preceded the beating showed that if appellant was guilty at all, his culpability did not rise above voluntary manslaughter.

2. The courts below erred in not suppressing the written confession appellant gave to the police three hours after his arrest because;

     a) the arrest was made without probable cause and the confession was a fruit of this illegal arrest,

     b) the confession was not voluntarily made, and

[ 485 Pa. Page 246]

    c) the confession was the product of unnecessary delay.

We have reviewed the record and find these contentions to be without merit.

Accordingly, the judgment of sentence is affirmed.

19790531

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.