Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

FAIR REST HOME v. COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA (05/29/79)

decided: May 29, 1979.

FAIR REST HOME, PETITIONER
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, RESPONDENT



Appeal from the Order of the Department of Health in case of In Re: Fair Rest Home, dated November 25, 1977.

COUNSEL

James H. Owen, with him Nickleach and Owen, for petitioner.

David F. Phifer, Assistant Attorney General, with him Jennifer A. Stiller, Assistant Attorney General, and Arthur T. McDermott, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Judges Crumlish, Jr., Wilkinson, Jr. and Mencer, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Crumlish, Jr.

Author: Crumlish

[ 43 Pa. Commw. Page 107]

Fair Rest Home (Petitioner) appeals an order of the Department of Health (Department) which revoked its license to operate a nursing home. It calls for remand and we so order.

The Department, without hearing and in reliance on an adjudication after full hearing by the Industrial Board of the Department of Labor and Industry (Industrial Board), revoked Petitioner's license.

Did the Department violate due process by failing to hold a hearing before it ordered revocation?

[ 43 Pa. Commw. Page 108]

Fair Rest Home was established on April 9, 1950. On January 23, 1975, an inspection by an agent of the Department of Labor and Industry revealed a number of safety deficiencies. On October 24, 1975, a reinspection found a majority of the deficiencies to have gone uncorrected. On April 26, 1977, the Industrial Board, following a full hearing, issued an order which would effect the gradual phasing out of nursing home operations.

The Department contends that it need not hold a hearing prior to adjudication because the Industrial Board had made a final adjudication following a full hearing. Continuing its contention, they argue that 2 Pa. C.S. ยง 504*fn1 does not necessarily require a hearing by the body which issued the final adjudication if the parties have had a reasonable opportunity to be heard by a "related" state agency. With this strained but ingenious interpretation we cannot agree. The clear language of the statute dictates that no adjudication shall be valid without first there having been given an opportunity to be heard.

Revocation of a nursing home license is not mandatory. The Department lapses when in a revocation proceeding it does not give careful consideration to its statutorily mandated responsibility to hear testimony. The concerns of the Department, including but not limited to consideration of mitigating factors, differing as they might from the concerns of a ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.