Appeal from the Order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review in case of In Re: Claim of Jackie R. Garman, No. B-144491.
John S. Alexander, with him Barbara J. Hart, William L. Botts, III, and Alan N. Linder, for petitioner.
William J. Kennedy, Assistant Attorney General, with him Gerald Gornish, Acting Attorney General, for respondent.
Judges Crumlish, Jr., Mencer and Craig, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Crumlish, Jr.
[ 41 Pa. Commw. Page 590]
Jackie R. Garman (Claimant) appeals a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirming the referee's denial of benefits pursuant to Section 401(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Act).*fn1
[ 41 Pa. Commw. Page 591]
5. The claimant has been medically unable to accept gainful employment since July 20, 1975. The date when she will be able to accept gainful employment is uncertain.
6. The claimant was medically unable to accept gainful employment during the period in question.
Claimant contends that Board's decision constituted a capricious disregard of competent evidence.
Claimant had been terminated July 7, 1975, from Penn Optical Co. because of excessive absenteeism. The record includes a doctor's certification submitted by Claimant dated December 15, 1975, which indicates that she was advised to quit for health reasons, that as of July 20, 1975, she was unable to accept gainful employment and that it was uncertain when Claimant would eventually be able to accept employment. The December 15, 1975 certificate noted that Claimant was suffering pain and in need of surgery. This we agree is sufficient to support the ...