Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER CO. AND LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. v. COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA (04/11/79)

decided: April 11, 1979.

FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER CO. AND LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., PETITIONERS
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD AND LEVERNE G. WEIDNER, RESPONDENTS



Appeal from the Order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board in case of Leverne G. Weidner v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., No. A-73190.

COUNSEL

John A. Fitzpatrick, with him Joseph R. Thompson, for petitioners.

Marc S. Jacobs, with him Roland Artigues, for respondents.

Judges Wilkinson, Jr., Mencer and Blatt, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Wilkinson, Jr. Judge Blatt dissents.

Author: Wilkinson

[ 41 Pa. Commw. Page 602]

This is the third time this case has been argued before this Court involving the attorney's fee, if any due claimant's counsel (respondent); once before a panel, once before the Court en Banc listed by this Court sua sponte resulting in a remand, and again in this appeal after a remand hearing. The previous argument before the Court en Banc was on an appeal from the decision of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the decision of the referee that suspended compensation payments and declined to award counsel fees. With an opinion by Judge Rogers, we reversed the Board, determined that counsel fees were due, and remanded "for the purpose of the entry of a further order suspending compensation payments and after further hearing the award to claimant of reasonable costs incurred for attorney's fees in connection with these proceedings." Weidner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 16 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 561, 565, 332 A.2d 885, 887 (1975). This reversal of the Board was based on our decision that there had been no showing of a reasonable contest.

[ 41 Pa. Commw. Page 603]

On remand counsel for claimant testified with commendable candor that his fee arrangement with claimant was to be 20 percent of any award received but if no award were received the claimant would not owe him any counsel fee.

Able counsel for claimant sets forth in his brief a convincing argument for why the law should provide payment by petitioner for his services to claimant under these circumstances, whether claimant has incurred any costs or not. Suffice it to say such argument must be made to the legislature and not to this Court.

Respondent's argument that Section 442 of The Pennsylvania Workmen's Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, added by Section 3 of the Act of February 8, 1972, P.L. 25, as amended, 77 P.S. ยง 998, supports his position is answered by a mere reading:

All counsel fees, agreed upon by claimant and his attorneys, for services performed in matters before any referee or the board, whether or not allowed as part of a judgment, shall be approved by the referee or board as the case may be, providing the counsel fees do not exceed twenty per centum of the amount awarded. The official conducting any hearing, upon cause shown, may allow a reasonable attorney fee exceeding twenty per centum of the amount awarded at the discretion of the hearing official.

In cases where the efforts of claimant's counsel to produce a result favorable to the claimant but where no immediate award of compensation is made such as in cases of termination or suspension the hearing official ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.