Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP SEWER AUTHORITY v. ESTHER ANDERSON ET AL. (01/22/79)

decided: January 22, 1979.

MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP SEWER AUTHORITY, APPELLANT
v.
ESTHER ANDERSON ET AL., APPELLEES



Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County in case of Millcreek Township Sewer Authority v. Esther Anderson et al., No. 4549 A 1977.

COUNSEL

William C. Sennett, with him Paul F. Curry, and Knox, Graham, McLaughlin, Gornall and Sennett, Inc., for appellant.

Norman H. Stark, with him MacDonald, Illig, Jones & Britton, for appellees.

Judges Rogers, Blatt and MacPhail, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Blatt.

Author: Blatt

[ 40 Pa. Commw. Page 41]

The Millcreek Township Sewer Authority (Authority) appeals here from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County which held that Section 610 of the Eminent Domain Code (Code) authorizes reasonable attorneys' and engineers' fees not to exceed $500.00 even when such are incurred in an unsuccessful challenge to a declaration of taking.

[ 40 Pa. Commw. Page 42]

The Authority filed a declaration of taking under the Code in 1975 in order to provide a right-of-way for a sewer system. Esther Anderson and fifteen other owners of the land which was condemned (appellees) filed preliminary objections which were dismissed by the court below, and they were equally unsuccessful in their appeal here. Riehl v. Millcreek Township Sewer Authority, 26 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 70, 362 A.2d 478 (1976). They then submitted a request for reimbursement in the amount of $500.00 each for the attorney and engineering fees which they had incurred. The Authority filed a petition for a Declaratory Judgment requesting the court below to determine whether or not Section 610 of the Code authorizes reimbursement under these circumstances and, the court held that such reimbursements were authorized, and this appeal followed.*fn1

Section 610 of the Code provides as follows:

The owner of any right, title, or interest in real property acquired or injured by an acquiring agency, who is not eligible for reimbursement of such fees under sections 406(e), 408 or 609 of this act, shall be reimbursed in an amount not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500) as a payment toward reasonable expenses actually incurred for appraisal, attorney and engineering fees.

26 P.S. ยง 1-610.

This special provision for reimbursement of expenses was probably enacted to assist owners of property acquired or injured under the Code in making an informed judgment regarding the reasonableness ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.