Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

PETE A. D'AMBROSI v. COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA (12/18/78)

decided: December 18, 1978.

PETE A. D'AMBROSI, JR., PETITIONER
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, RESPONDENT



Appeal from the Order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review in case of In Re: Claim of Pete A. D'Ambrosi, Jr., No. B-142222.

COUNSEL

William M. Panella, for petitioner.

Michael Klein, Assistant Attorney General, with him Gerald Gornish, Attorney General, for respondent.

Judges Crumlish, Jr., Wilkinson, Jr. and Craig, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Craig.

Author: Craig

[ 39 Pa. Commw. Page 279]

Claimant Pete D'Ambrosi appeals from the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) disallowing his appeal from the Bureau's denial of unemployment compensation benefits under Section 402(b)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of December 5, 1936, P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. ยง 802(b)(1).

The Board found that the claimant had voluntarily terminated his employment with Youngstown Window Cleaning Company on December 10, 1976 due to personal reasons, without cause of a necessitous or compelling nature, as required by Section 402(b)(1), and therefore he was ineligible for compensation under the Law. From the Board's final order, the claimant appeals. We affirm.

Having quit his employment, the burden was upon claimant to establish that his cause for doing so was of a necessitous and compelling nature. Keisling v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 198 Pa. Superior Ct. 345, 347, 181 A.2d 717, 718 (1962).

[ 39 Pa. Commw. Page 280]

Our role here is to determine whether the referee's findings of fact are sufficient to support the legal conclusion that claimant voluntarily, without necessitous or compelling cause, terminated his employment, and if so, whether these findings are supported by substantial evidence. Unemployment Compensation Page 280} Board of Review v. Beyer, 20 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 17, 21, 340 A.2d 601, 603 (1975).

The documents before the referee, including the Summary of Interview before the Bureau, present claimant's multiple reasons for quitting. In claimant's own words, he was "too busy" and "it was too far" (20 miles each way) to Youngstown for part-time work (4 hours a day, 5 days a week, $9.00 a day) and in winter it was "too hard to drive to Youngstown."*fn1

Based upon the evidence, the referee found that:

3. Claimant voluntarily terminated his employment due to ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.