decided: October 24, 1978.
CARL J. DAVIS, PETITIONER
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, RESPONDENT
Appeal from the Order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review in case of In Re: Claim of Carl J. Davis, No. B-139966.
Carl J. Davis, petitioner, for himself.
Charles G. Hasson, Assistant Attorney General, with him Gerald Gornish, Acting Attorney General, for respondent.
Judges Crumlish, Jr., Wilkinson, Jr. and Craig, sitting as a panel of three.
Author: Per Curiam
[ 38 Pa. Commw. Page 234]
The only issue raised by Appellant, Carl J. Davis, is whether the finding of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review that he was discharged as a result of willful misconduct connected with his employment is supported by substantial evidence. We have reviewed, with intensity, the record made before the hearing authorities and are satisfied that the testimony of the employer's foreman, Frank Cooney, and its assistant personnel director, Stanley Kogut, sufficiently supports the Board's finding that Appellant was discharged for excessive absenteeism and violation of a labor management agreement.
[ 38 Pa. Commw. Page 235]
And Now, this 24th day of October, 1978, the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review denying unemployment compensation benefits to Carl J. Davis is affirmed.
© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.