Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

APPEAL JOHN J. AND MARY F. SKOWRONEK. COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA (11/17/77)

decided: November 17, 1977.

IN RE: APPEAL OF JOHN J. AND MARY F. SKOWRONEK. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD, APPELLANT


Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County in case of In Re: Appeal of John J. and Mary F. Skowronek, t/a Yeadon Sports Bar, No. A-33, Page 272, March Sessions, 1976.

COUNSEL

J. Leonard Langan, Assistant Attorney General, with him Harry Bowytz, Chief Counsel, and Robert P. Kane, Attorney General, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Judges Rogers and Blatt, sitting as a panel of two. Opinion by Judge Blatt.

Author: Blatt

[ 32 Pa. Commw. Page 424]

The Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (Board) appeals to this Court from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County which sustained the appeal of John J. and Mary F. Skowronek (licensees) from a Board order.

The licensees, trading as Yeadon Sports Bar, were cited for the sale of beer to a minor in April of 1975 and were fined $600.*fn1 On appeal, the court below conducted a de novo hearing at which conflicting evidence was presented as to whether or not the minor concerned had been required to present a Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board identification card at the time of his purchase. The court found as a fact that the sale was made on the basis that such a card had been presented and it reversed the Board's adjudication. Our scope of review here is limited to a determination of whether or not the Board's order is supported by sufficient evidence and whether or not the lower court committed an error of law or abused its discretion. Re: Diana, 31 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 363, 375 A.2d 1386 (1977).

The Board argues that the Liquor Code*fn2 (Code) requires not only that a retail liquor licensee shall require a person whose age may be in question to present a Liquor Control Board identification card but also that such person likewise be required to fill in and sign a card, the form of which is prescribed in Section 495(c) of the Code, 47 P.S. ยง 4-495(c), and

[ 32 Pa. Commw. Page 425]

    which the licensee is required to keep on file for examination. This section provides:

In addition to the presentation of such identification card, the . . . licensee or his servant, agent or employe, shall require the person whose age may be in question to fill in and sign a card in the following form:

Such statement shall be printed upon a 3 inch by 5 inch or 4 inch by 5 inch file card, which card shall be filed alphabetically by the State Liquor Store or licensee, at or before the close of business on the day of which said certificate is executed, in a file box containing a suitable alphabetical index, and which card shall be subject to examination by any officer, agent or employe of the Liquor Control Board at any and all times.

There was no testimony requested or provided in the court below that the minor had been required to fill in and sign a card in compliance with this section, which is essential to establish a defense by a licensee in proceedings charging the sale of beer to a minor. In the Matter of Revocation of Restaurant Liquor License No. R-9750, 31 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 639, 377 A.2d 1040 (1977). It was, therefore, an error of law for the court below to reverse the order of the Board with no evidence before it that there had been complete compliance with the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.