Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

JOHN J. MENTZ v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD REVIEW COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA (03/16/77)

decided: March 16, 1977.

JOHN J. MENTZ, APPELLANT
v.
UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA



Appeal from the Order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review in case of In Re: Claim of John J. Mentz, No. B-130445.

COUNSEL

David L. Hill, for appellant.

Susan Shinkman, Assistant Attorney General, with her Sydney Reuben, Assistant Attorney General, and Robert P. Kane, Attorney General, for appellee.

Judges Kramer, Rogers and Blatt, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Kramer.

Author: Kramer

[ 29 Pa. Commw. Page 288]

This is an appeal by John J. Mentz (appellant) from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board), dated March 18, 1976, which

[ 29 Pa. Commw. Page 289]

    reversed a referee's decision and denied benefits pursuant to Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law*fn1 (Act) on the ground that appellant had been discharged for wilful misconduct.

Appellant was employed by the Heintz Division of Kelsey Hayes, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for thirteen years as a metal finisher. He had a poor attendance record and had been warned about excessive absenteeism and failure to properly report off during periods of absence. Due to chest pains from a heart condition, appellant was absent from work from March 10 to March 12 of 1975. Upon reporting to work on March 13, 1975, appellant was discharged. The referee found that appellant had given proper notice of his absence. On appeal by the employer, the Board substituted its own finding that the appellant had not given proper notice of his absences on March 10 and 11, and, based on that finding, reversed the referee's award of benefits.

Appellant first challenges the timeliness of the employer's appeal to the Board. The referee's decision was issued on June 5, 1975. The employer's appeal was filed with the Board on June 16, 1975. Section 502 of the Act, 43 P.S. ยง 822, requires that an appeal to the Board from the decision of a referee be filed within ten days of the date the decision is issued.*fn2 Thus it would appear that the appeal to the Board in this case was one day late. However, we may take judicial notice of the day upon which a date falls, and June 15, 1975, the tenth and last day of the appeal period, fell on a Sunday. The Statutory Construction Act of 1972 provides:

[ 29 Pa. Commw. Page 290]

When any period of time is referred to in any statute, such period in all cases, except as otherwise provided in section 1909 of this title (relating to publication for successive weeks) and section 1910 of this title (relating to computation of months) shall be so computed as to exclude the first and include the last day of such period. Whenever the last day of any such period shall fall on Saturday or Sunday, or on any day made a legal holiday by the laws of this Commonwealth or of the United States, such day shall be omitted from the computation.*fn3

Because the last day of the ten-day appeal period fell on a Sunday, the final date for taking appeal was automatically extended to Monday, June 16th. Erie Redevelopment Authority v. Pulakos, 439 Pa. 157, 267 A.2d 873 (1970), cert. denied, 400 ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.