Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

ROBERT B. ANDERSON v. BERNHARD REALTY SALES COMPANY (11/24/76)

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA


decided: November 24, 1976.

ROBERT B. ANDERSON
v.
BERNHARD REALTY SALES COMPANY, INC., ET AL. APPEAL OF REVEST, INC., AND RONALD HEURICH. GILROY REID V. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, APPELLANT

Appeal Nos. 108 March Term, 1975 and 317 January Term, 1975, from the Order of the Superior Court entered September 23, 1974, at Nos. 82 and 117, April Term, 1974 and December 11, 1974, at No. 284 October Term, 1974; Silvestri and Hirsch, Judges.

COUNSEL

Ralph A. Davies, Thomson, Rhodes & Grigsby, James F. Manley, Burns, Manley & Little, Pittsburgh, for appellant in No. 108.

Lewis H. Van Dusen, Jr., Chief Counsel, Joseph F. Keener, Jr., General Claims Atty., Emil F. Toften, Deputy General Claims Atty., Frederick T. Lachat, Jr., Philadelphia, for appellant in No. 317.

Mathew Verlich, Stokes, Lurie & Tracy, Pittsburgh, for appellee in No. 108.

George P. Stahl, Jr., Philadelphia, for appellee in No. 317.

Robert R. Artz, Philadelphia, Richard Klaber, Dickie, McCamey & Chilcotte, Pittsburgh, Francis H. Patrano, Patrano, Ceisler, Edwards & Pettit, California, for Pa. Defense Institute.

Norman M. Berger, Philadelphia, Craig W. Bremer, Harrisburg, for amicus curiae.

Jones, C. J., and Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix and Manderino, JJ. Roberts, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which Pomeroy and Nix, JJ., join.

Author: Per Curiam

[ 469 Pa. Page 489]

OPINION

Our disposition of these consolidated appeals is controlled by our decision in Lamp v. Heyman, 469 Pa. , 366 A.2d 882 (1976).

In No. 108 March Term, 1975, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed.

In No. 317 January Term, 1975, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed.

ROBERTS, Justice (dissenting).

I dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions in Lamp v. Heyman, 469 Pa. , , 366 A.2d 882, 889, 892 (1976) (ROBERTS, J., joined by POMEROY and NIX, JJ.; and POMEROY, J., joined by ROBERTS and NIX, JJ.).

19761124

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.