Appeal from the Order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board in case of Sixto Pagan v. Dewitt P. Henry Company, dated December 31, 1975, No. A-70423.
Angela M. Cerino, with her Elias H. Stein, and Stein and Silverman, for appellant.
Michael P. McKenna, with him Susan J. Poll, John F. McElvenny, and James N. Diefenderfer, for appellees.
President Judge Bowman and Judges Crumlish, Jr. and Wilkinson, Jr., sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Wilkinson.
[ 27 Pa. Commw. Page 496]
This is a workmen's compensation case. On September 21, 1970, claimant, in the course of his employment, slipped and struck his head on a cement floor. He was treated that same day at Germantown Hospital, for a concussion, but refused to be admitted into the hospital. He was, however, admitted to Germantown Hospital the following day, but discharged himself, against medical advice, on October 5, 1970. The diagnosis at that time was mild cerebral concussion and possible sprain of the lumbar and cervical spine.
Shortly after the accident, claimant became quarrelsome and aggressive at home and began to increase his consumption of alcohol. This behavior resulted in his admission to Hahneman Hospital in April of 1971. His condition, when discharged, was diagnosed as possible undifferentiated schizophrenia. On March 8, 1971, claimant filed a Claim Petition alleging total disability caused by head injury and brain damage, resulting from his fall.
Claimant was awarded benefits by the referee, who found that claimant's "schizophrenia" was caused by
[ 27 Pa. Commw. Page 497]
his fall at work on September 21, 1970. On appeal, in a decision dated December 31, 1975, the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Board) dismissed the claim, finding that there was "not sufficient competent evidence to sustain a finding of causation nor an award."
The essential question in this case is whether or not the accident (claimant's falling and striking his head) was the cause of his schizophrenia. The burden of proof herein was on the claimant to establish such causal connection by competent evidence. Malocheski v. Consolidated Cigar Corp. et al., 12 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 430, 316 A.2d 81 (1974). To this end, claimant presented solely the testimony of Dr. Hamann, a psychiatrist, who stated:
We are aware that injury of appreciable degree to any part of the body may occasionally serve as a contributory or precipitatory agent in schizophrenia in persons predisposed to this illness and that appears to be the case of Mr. Sixto Pagan. My diagnosis was a ...