Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

PENNSYLVANIA TAVERN ASSOCIATION AND P.U.B.L.I.C. v. COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA (02/10/76)

decided: February 10, 1976.

PENNSYLVANIA TAVERN ASSOCIATION AND P.U.B.L.I.C., AN UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION, BY ROBERT E. WEAVER, VINCE REDAVID, ROBERT P. LATCHAW, BARNEY JARDIN, FRED STAIR, MARTIN T. SCHOBER, PAUL HARDING, WILLIAM LATCHAW, WILLIAM STAFFORD, HORACE ROST, JR. AND JAMES K. CAVANAUGH, TRUSTEES AD LITEM, PLAINTIFFS
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD, DEFENDANT. ELEMAR, INC., GARRETT HILL BEVERAGE CO., INC., RAILSPLITTER, INC., AND GENERAL PROGRAMMING, INC., INTERVENING DEFENDANTS



Original jurisdiction in case of Pennsylvania Tavern Association and P.U.B.L.I.C., an unincorporated association, by Robert E. Weaver, Vince ReDavid, Robert P. Latchaw, Barney Jardin, Fred Stair, Martin T. Schober, Paul Harding, William Latchaw, William Stafford, Horace Rost, Jr. and James K. Cavanaugh, Trustees Ad Litem, v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board.

COUNSEL

John H. Bream, with him Gregory M. Kerwin, for plaintiffs.

Sidney A. Simon, Special Assistant Attorney General, with him David Shotel, Assistant Attorney General, James P. Deeley, Assistant Attorney General, Harry Bowytz, Chief Counsel, and Robert P. Kane, Attorney General, for defendants.

George G. Lindsay, for intervening defendants.

President Judge Bowman and Judges Crumlish, Jr., Kramer, Wilkinson, Jr., Mencer, Rogers and Blatt. Opinion by Judge Mencer.

Author: Mencer

[ 23 Pa. Commw. Page 265]

On May 8, 1972, the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (Board) issued three identical citations against three Lancaster County beer distributors: Elemar, Inc., Garrett Hill Beverage Co., Inc., and Railsplitter, Inc., all trading as Thrifty Beverage. Each was charged with having "permitted a person who has an interest in another Distributor or Importing Distributor License to have an interest in your licensed business."*fn1

[ 23 Pa. Commw. Page 266]

On August 25, 1972, the Board suspended all three licenses for a period of twenty-one days or until such time as all of the illegal interests had been divested. The licensees appealed to the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, which sustained the suspensions. A subsequent appeal to this Court was withdrawn.

On November 14, 1974, the Pennsylvania Tavern Association and P.U.B.L.I.C., an unincorporated association, by eleven individual licensees of the Board, (plaintiffs) brought this collateral action in mandamus in the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County to compel the Board to enforce the original court-approved orders and penalties. It was stipulated of record that, on January 15, 1975, the Board, on petition of the licensees, took action to vacate the suspension of their licenses and to modify the penalty to a fine of $1,000 in each case. This action by the Board was directly contrary to the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County and to the prayer of the complaint in mandamus now being considered by this Court.

On September 19, 1975, following the close of pleadings, the plaintiffs filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. We have now received briefs and heard arguments relative to this motion and conclude that the motion has merit and should be granted.

The order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County filed in this case is as follows:

"And Now, October 19, 1973, for the foregoing reasons, the order of the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board of August 25, 1972 suspending the licenses of Elemar, Inc. t/a Thrifty Beverage, Garrett Hill Beverage Co., Inc. t/a Thrifty Beverage, and Railsplitter, Inc. t/a Thrifty Beverage, for twenty-one days and thereafter until persons other than the licensees had been divested of ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.