Searching over 5,500,000 cases.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.



decided: October 3, 1975.



M. F. Beausang, Jr., Butera & Detwiler, G. K. Reis, King of Prussia, for appellants.

Gilbert P. High, Jr., Norristown, for appellee.

Jones, C. J., and Eagen, O'Brien, Pomeroy, Nix and Manderino, JJ. Roberts, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. Nix, J., concurs in the result.

Author: Pomeroy

[ 464 Pa. Page 12]


This is an appeal from a final decree confirming the first and final account of the executors of the estate of Brady L. Bryner, deceased. The sole question presented concerns the apportionment of the federal estate tax. The court below interpreted Mr. Bryner's will as authorizing payment of all death taxes out of the assets of a certain testamentary trust, and permitted the executors to proceed accordingly. Appellants, three beneficiaries of the trust, contend that the federal estate tax should be paid out of the residue of the estate, or at least apportioned between the residue and the trust.*fn1

Brady L. Bryner died on November 29, 1970, leaving an estate worth in excess of two million dollars. By his will, dated July 16, 1969, the testator left his household goods and personal effects to his wife and made pecuniary bequests totaling one hundred ten thousand dollars. The testator directed that these legacies should pass "free and clear of all transfer, inheritance and estate taxes, said taxes to be paid out of assets remaining after payment of said legacies."

The bulk of Mr. Bryner's estate, consisting of certain real estate and all the stock of a corporation known as the Bryner Chevrolet Company, was left in trust for decedent's wife, his daughters, and appellants under paragraph Sixth of his will. Appellants are three grandchildren of the testator, who together have a one sixth interest in the income and principal of the trust. In their account the executors valued the total trust assets at approximately one and a half million dollars. The residue of Mr. Bryner's estate, amounting to less than four hundred

[ 464 Pa. Page 13]

    thousand dollars, was left in equal shares to the testator's five daughters, appellees herein.

Death taxes payable out of Mr. Bryner's estate totaled more than four hundred thousand dollars.*fn2 The court below approved the executors' election to pay these taxes out of the assets of the Bryner Chevrolet Company. In so doing it relied upon the following provision contained in the penultimate subparagraph of paragraph Sixth of the will: "It is my desire and I therefore authorize that all of the assets in the Bryner Chevrolet Company, excepting the real estate (unless absolutely necessary) be made available to pay transfer, inheritance and estate taxes assessed against my estate, and in order to effectuate this I hereby authorize and empower my executors and trustees to partially or entirely dissolve Bryner Chevrolet Company." Appellants contend that this provision constitutes a direction that the assets of the trust should pass free of federal estate tax to the greatest extent possible. We see nothing in the record to support this contention. Reading this provision in the context of the entire will and the circumstances surrounding the testator when he made it,*fn3 we think it clear that Mr. Bryner expected his corporation to bear the burden of all death taxes.

The testator expressly exempted the corporation's real estate from contribution to the payment of death taxes "unless absolutely necessary," but the other corporate assets available to the executors were more than sufficient for the purpose. The evidence at the audit indicates that beginning in 1965, Mr. Bryner arranged for the Bryner Chevrolet Company to invest in short-term interest bearing

[ 464 Pa. Page 14]

    notes to provide a fund for death taxes. At the time of his death, this fund alone amounted to approximately three hundred thousand dollars.*fn4

Appellants place particular emphasis on Mr. Bryner's direction that the corporation's assets "be made available" for payment of death taxes: "the clear implication of the phrase ' be made available ' is that the assets of the trust were to be used only as a 'last ditch', temporary source of tax money. This phrase can be subject to no other meaning."*fn5 On the contrary, we think the most that can be inferred from the testator's choice of words is that, recognizing that his financial circumstances might change prior to his death, he chose to give his executors some discretion in the apportionment of death taxes.*fn6 In fact, no such change occurred. Adding the

[ 464 Pa. Page 15]

    federal estate tax to the substantial administration expenses with which the residuary estate is already burdened would wipe out the residuary legacies altogether. There is no reason to suppose that such a result is what the testator intended.

Appellants contend, alternatively, that the federal estate tax should be apportioned in some fashion between the trust and the residuary estate. Assuming the executors had discretion to make such an apportionment, we can find no abuse of that discretion in their failure to do so. The expenses of administration amount, roughly, to a quarter to a third of the residuary estate, while the estate and inheritance taxes together comprise a similar fraction of the trust assets. Allocating the burden of these taxes entirely to the trust is consistent both with the testator's intent and with basic fairness.

Decree affirmed. Costs on Appellants.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.