decided: July 10, 1975.
UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHARLES E. LEIB, APPELLANT
Appeal from the Order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review in case of In Re: Claim of Charles E. Leib, No. B-122864.
David C. Harrison, for appellant.
Daniel R. Schuckers, Assistant Attorney General, with him Sydney Reuben, Assistant Attorney General, and Robert P. Kane, Attorney General, for appellee.
Judges Wilkinson, Jr., Mencer and Rogers, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Rogers.
[ 20 Pa. Commw. Page 207]
The sole question in this case is whether pension benefits paid to the appellant are to be offset against unemployment compensation benefits pursuant to Section 404(d)(iii) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess. P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. § 804(d)(iii) (Supp. 1974-1975). We have twice squarely held that they are. Etter v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 12 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 642, 316 A.2d 659 (1974); Ettelson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 12 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 617, 316 A.2d 661 (1974). The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania denied the prayer of a petition for allocatur in Etter and we adhere to our prior determination.
And Now, this 10th day of July, 1975, it is ordered that the instant appeal be and it is dismissed, and the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review be and it is affirmed.
© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.