decided: April 17, 1975.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHARLES ROCHELLE, APPELLANT
John J. Dean, Stephen P. Swem, Pittsburgh, for appellant.
John J. Hickton, Dist. Atty., Robert L. Eberhardt, Asst. Dist. Atty., Pittsburgh, for appellee.
Jones, C. J., and Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix and Manderino, JJ.
Author: Per Curiam
[ 461 Pa. Page 341]
OPINION OF THE COURT
The appellant stands convicted of murder in the first degree and here argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. Viewing the evidence, as we must, in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, Commonwealth v. Murray, 460 Pa. 605, 334 A.2d 255 (filed March 18, 1975); Commonwealth v. Paquette, 451 Pa. 250, 301 A.2d 837 (1973), we find the evidence sufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.