Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

COMMONWEALTH v. ELLER (12/11/74)

decided: December 11, 1974.

COMMONWEALTH, APPELLANT,
v.
ELLER



Appeal from order of Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County, No. 2555 of 1973, in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Ronald Eller.

COUNSEL

Stephen B. Harris, Assistant District Attorney, with him Kenneth G. Biehn, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellant.

Paul Laskow, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.

Watkins, P. J., Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van der Voort, and Spaeth, JJ. Opinion by Van der Voort, J.

Author: Van Der Voort

[ 232 Pa. Super. Page 100]

On August 27, 1973, a criminal complaint was filed against defendant-appellee. He was arrested and arraigned on September 22, 1973. October 17, 1973, had been set for hearing, but defendant did not appear and was declared a fugitive. On July 23, 1973, the Grand Jury returned an indictment of "theft" against defendant,*fn1 who was re-arrested and arraigned on May 3, 1974. At this arraignment, defendant's counsel moved to dismiss the indictment on grounds of violation of Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 1100(a) (1) which provides that "[t]rial in a court case . . . shall commence no later than two hundred seventy (270)

[ 232 Pa. Super. Page 101]

    days from the date on which the complaint is filed."*fn2 Violation was alleged because trial was set for May 28, 1974. Trial court granted the application to dismiss at trial on the latter date.

For purposes of this appeal, the Commonwealth urges upon us that the trial court erred in the computation of time for the running of the 270 day period, and that said error was grounded upon a misinterpretation of the effect of the Commonwealth's denial of one of defendant's statements in his Application to Dismiss the Indictment. The crucial dates for computation of the "270 days" are August 27, 1973, for its commencement, and May 28, 1974, the date of trial. This period is four (4) days in excess of two hundred seventy (270) days. The Commonwealth contends that the appellee was unavailable from July 23, 1973, to May 3, 1974, so that this period of time must be excluded from the running of the 270 day period.*fn3 Section (d) (1) of Rule 1100 specifically so provides.*fn4 If the time during which the appellee was not available is excluded from the computation, the 270 day period had not expired.

The Commonwealth impliedly admitted that the appellee had not caused more than 30 days delay. Paragraph 6 of appellee's pre-trial application to dismiss reads: "6. There has been no delay or continuance in

[ 232 Pa. Super. Page 102]

    excess of 30 days attributable to the defendant or his attorney."

The Commonwealth's answer was: "6. No answer is required as same states a ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.