Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

JOHN P. NEALS v. CITY PHILADELPHIA (09/06/74)

decided: September 6, 1974.

JOHN P. NEALS, APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, APPELLEE



Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County in case of In the Matter of: John P. Neals Appeal from the Civil Service Commission, No. 4160 December Term, 1971.

COUNSEL

James A. Alexy, for appellant.

Wanda P. Chocallo, Assistant City Solicitor, with her Martin Weinberg, City Solicitor, for appellee.

Judges Kramer, Wilkinson, Jr. and Blatt, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Blatt.

Author: Blatt

[ 15 Pa. Commw. Page 6]

This is an appeal by John P. Neals (appellant) from the lower court's affirmance of an order of the Philadelphia Civil Service Commission (Commission) which denied the appellant's petition to reverse and remand. His petition included a request to reinstate an appeal which the Commission held had previously been withdrawn by letter of the appellant. A full recitation of the facts which surround this case can be found in the companion case of John P. Neals v. City of Philadelphia, Board of Pensions and Retirement, 14 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 645, 325 A.2d 339 (No. 747 C.D. 1973, filed September 6, 1974).

Only some of the facts are germane to this narrow appeal. The appellant was properly served a Notice

[ 15 Pa. Commw. Page 7]

    of Intention To Dismiss, signed by the Police Commissioner. The charges in the notice included (1) Conduct Unbecoming an Officer, (2) Neglect of Duty, and (3) Disobedience of Orders, and they grew out of an investigation in which it appeared that the appellant had mishandled money recovered from persons whom he apprehended after a holdup and had given some money to a policeman and a detective. He was accused of failing to supervise his subordinates properly after the arrest he had made, both in connection with the disposition of evidence and in the proper preparation of property receipts. Furthermore, the appellant was accused of failing to follow the departmental procedures required in the general handling of evidence, in making a search of apprehended persons and in his contact with the holdup victim in the case concerned.

The appellant was suspended for thirty days without pay on April 6, 1970 and was dismissed effective May 3, 1970. He timely filed an appeal from this dismissal, and a hearing was held before the Philadelphia Civil Service Commission on July 2, 1970. He was represented by counsel at this hearing, and testimony was presented by eight witnesses including the appellant himself.

The Commission deferred its decision pending the disposition of the Regulation 32 hearing which also involved the appellant. When it was informed on January 14, 1971 that the appellant had withdrawn his appeal regarding the dismissal, however, the Commission closed the dismissal appeal without filing any opinion.

The appellant now contends that the attorney for the Commission told him that "it was the objective of the Police Department to remove the Petitioner, and that they would be willing to pay all benefits, ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.