Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County in case of John Montgomery, Anne Martin, Martin J. Oliveri, Jr., Shirley Turnage, Anna E. Torba and Ann Dalson v. Westmoreland County Board of Assessment Appeals, and Gene McCutcheon as Chairman of the Westmoreland County Board of Assessment Appeals, Charles E. Gadd as a member of the Westmoreland County Board of Assessment Appeals, William E. Knepshield as a member of the Westmoreland County Board of Assessment Appeals, No. 407 January Term, 1973.
H. Reginald Belden, Jr., with him David E. Lehman and McNees, Wallace & Nurick, for appellants.
Thomas M. Kerr, with him Roland T. Keddie and Roger S. Whitehill, for appellees.
President Judge Bowman and Judges Crumlish, Jr., Kramer, Wilkinson, Jr., Mencer, Rogers and Blatt. Opinion by Judge Mencer.
This appeal is from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County sustaining the appeal of John Montgomery, Anne Martin, Martin J. Oliveri, Jr., Shirley Turnage, Anna E. Torba, and Ann Dalson from a denial of access to, and the viewing and making or obtaining copies of, certain records in the possession of the Board for the Assessment and Revision of Taxes of Westmoreland County (Board).
The Board is created by statute*fn1 and has the duty*fn2 "to make and have supervision of the making of annual assessments of persons, property and occupations now or hereafter made subject to assessment for taxation. . . ."
In performing the above duty, the Board maintains records on cards known as "property record cards." On one side of these cards is a "property record," containing information pertaining to the history and physical characteristics of the land involved. On the reverse side is a "building record," containing extensive information on construction specifications together with dwelling and commercial computations relating to the building on the property involved.
On the day of the hearing before the court below, the parties entered into a stipulation in order to narrow the issue before the Court. The property record was stipulated to be a public record, as this term is defined in the act commonly known as the "right-to-know law."*fn3 The narrow issue stipulated to the court below and presented to this Court is whether or not the building record side of the Board's property cards is a public record under the right-to-know law. If it is, then the Board must permit the appellees to make copies of these records.*fn4
The right-to-know law defines a public record, in Section 1 of the Act, 65 P.S. § 66.1(2), as follows: "(2) 'Public Record.' Any account, voucher or contract dealing with the receipt or disbursement of funds by an agency or its acquisition, use or disposal of services or of supplies, materials, equipment or other property and any minute, order or decision by an agency fixing the personal or property rights, privileges, immunities, duties or obligations of any person or group of persons : Provided, That the term 'public records' shall not mean any report, communication or other paper, the publication of which would disclose the institution, progress or result of an investigation undertaken by an agency in the performance of its official duties, except those
reports filed by agencies pertaining to safety and health in industrial plants; it shall not include any record, document, material, exhibit, pleading, report, memorandum or other paper, access to or the publication of which is prohibited, restricted or forbidden by statute law or order or decree of court, or which would operate to the prejudice or impairment of a person's reputation or personal security, or which would result in the loss by the Commonwealth or any of its political subdivisions or commissions or State ...