Appeal from judgment of sentence of Court of Common Pleas, Criminal Division, of Allegheny County, Oct. T., 1971, Nos. 6651 and 6652, in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Ronald Williams.
John H. Corbett, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, with him John J. Dean, Assistant Public Defender, and George H. Ross, Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert L. Campbell, Assistant District Attorney, with him Robert L. Eberhardt, Assistant District Attorney, and Robert W. Duggan, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
Jones, C. J., Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix and Manderino, JJ. Opinion by Mr. Justice O'Brien.
Appellant Ronald Williams, was tried by a judge, sitting with a jury, in Allegheny County and found
guilty of voluntary manslaughter. Post-trial motions were argued and denied. Appellant was then sentenced to a term of not less than six nor more than twelve years in a state correctional institution. This appeal followed.
On August 21, 1971, at approximately 11:15 p.m., Sarah Montgomery, the victim's wife, was sleeping in her bedroom, when she was awakened by voices coming from the kitchen. She saw three individuals in the kitchen immediately across the table from her husband. She specifically identified appellant as one of the visitors and placed him near her husband. She testified that she heard one of the individuals in the room say, "If he moves, blow his brains out." Soon afterward, the gun which appellant had in his hand discharged, and the victim fell to the floor. The victim's wife was positive that appellant was the gunman and she stated unequivocally that the gun appellant was holding was discharged in the direction of the decedent. No other shots were fired.
With the permission of Mrs. Montgomery, police conducted a search of the apartment she shared with her husband. A supply of marijuana was discovered in the victim's dresser drawer. Two days later, on or about August 23, 1971, Major Reed, a co-defendant of appellant, was arrested at the residence of Yvonne Nunley. The police, armed with a search warrant, searched the residence of Miss Nunley and found certain marijuana, later offered into evidence, that, according to an expert witness, was of the same chemical content as the marijuana found at the victim's home. The Commonwealth's purpose in offering the evidence was to prove that the killing of the victim was perpetrated during the course of a felony, i.e., the armed theft of the marijuana.
Appellant's principal allegations of error concern what he contends to be the improper admission into
evidence of this second supply of marijuana seized in ...