Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

COMMONWEALTH v. STROHL (06/14/73)

decided: June 14, 1973.

COMMONWEALTH
v.
STROHL, APPELLANT



Appeals from judgment of sentence of Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, April T., 1968, No. 4, in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Edward Strohl.

COUNSEL

Harry L. Green, First Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Stewart J. Greenleaf, Assistant District Attorney, with him William T. Nicholas, First Assistant District Attorney, and Milton O. Moss, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Wright, P. J., Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding, Cercone, and Spaeth, JJ. Dissenting Opinion by Hoffman, J. Jacobs, J., joins in this dissenting opinion.

Author: Per Curiam

[ 226 Pa. Super. Page 226]

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Disposition

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Dissenting Opinion by Hoffman, J.:

Appellant contends that his conviction should be reversed because evidence admitted at trial was obtained through an invalid search warrant.

During February 20-21, 1968, six businesses and one private home in the Telford-Souderton area were burglarized. In connection with these burglaries, Bethlehem Police called Telford Police to inform them that three individuals, Francis Bobko, Edward Strohl and

[ 226 Pa. Super. Page 227]

John D'Amico, were proceeding to their vicinity in a 1960 white Mercury convertible to "do a few jobs". As a result of police investigation, Bobko was arrested and certain items identified as belonging to the owners of the burglarized ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.